Display Interface Viewer Affinity Content Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current display devices lack the ability to effectively customize content selection based on viewer identification, failing to present images that are most likely to be of interest to the viewer, especially in a dynamic and social context where subject affinity and relationships play a crucial role.

Innovation Solution

The system identifies viewer faces, matches them with corresponding user accounts, computes affinity scores using social distance and co-occurrence data, and sorts images based on these scores to select and display the most relevant content, incorporating features like zone weighting and face size ratios to refine the presentation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If images are selected based on simple rotation or fixed algorithms, then device complexity is reduced, but content personalization and viewer engagement deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent personalizationVSAvoidselection algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-computes affinity scores for all subject-face pairs and stores them in lookup tables before image display. When selecting images, the system simply retrieves these pre-computed scores and sums them, rather than performing complex real-time analysis. This preliminary computation approach enables personalized content selection without requiring complex runtime processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The image selection process is divided into independent components: face detection, subject identification, affinity score retrieval, and score aggregation. Each component operates independently and can be implemented separately, allowing the system to achieve complex personalization through simple, modular operations rather than a monolithic complex algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of information

If subject information is displayed for all subjects in upcoming images, then information completeness is improved, but display clutter and user attention dilution worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubject information completenessVSAvoiduser interface clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The status bar displays subject information with varying prominence based on local affinity scores. Subjects with higher affinity to the viewer are displayed with greater emphasis (such as larger icons or different colors), while subjects with lower affinity are displayed with less prominence. This allows the interface to provide complete information while guiding user attention to the most relevant subjects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and highlights only the most relevant subject information in the status bar, separating it from less important information. By using affinity scores to determine which subjects to feature prominently, the system provides complete information about all subjects while visually extracting and emphasizing only those most likely to interest the viewer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9727312B1Providing subject information regarding upcoming images on a display
Publication Date: 2017.08.08 IKORONGO TECH LLC
  • US9727312B1 patent drawing
  • US9727312B1 patent drawing
  • US9727312B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods are described for presenting in a user interface information regarding the subject faces that will appear in upcoming images. In general, many of the images available to display will be comprised of images containing subject faces. Based on a subject affinity score between the viewer and the subjects, and image affinity is computed. Based on the image affinity scores, images are selected for presentation on the display. As images are displayed, the system analyzes some portion of the upcoming images to determine the subject information to display. As each image is displayed, subject information comprised of the subjects face and subject prominence information may be shown in an area of the display adjacent to the current image. The subject prominence information may be determined as a function of a face size ratio value and a zone value.