Rule-Based Arbitration for Vehicle Display Content Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing display control systems for vehicles face challenges in managing diverse content displays across multiple devices, leading to difficulties in defining all possible content behaviors, especially when multiple applications request simultaneous display, resulting in unintended content being displayed.

Innovation Solution

A rule-based arbitration method is implemented, using a rule definition that includes an arbitration policy and constraint expressions to determine content allocation based on priority, Z order, and size, ensuring that only intended content is displayed by re-arbitrating when constraint expressions are not met.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple display devices are mounted to display diverse contents, then the versatility of content display is improved, but the complexity of managing content allocation and arbitration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent display versatilityVSAvoidcontent management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the content management system into distinct modules: display device management module, content allocation module, and arbitration module. Each module handles specific aspects of content display independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining versatility across multiple display devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary arbitration mechanism that mediates between multiple content sources and display devices. The arbitration module acts as a mediator that resolves conflicts and allocates content based on predefined rules, simplifying the management complexity of diverse content display scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If rule-based arbitration is implemented with constraint expressions, then the precision of content allocation is improved, but the computational complexity of arbitration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent allocation precisionVSAvoidarbitration computation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining arbitration rules and constraint expressions before content allocation occurs. The system establishes priority levels, display preferences, and constraint conditions in advance, allowing the arbitration module to make precise allocation decisions through rule matching rather than complex real-time computation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by transforming content allocation decisions into evaluations of predefined parameters such as priority levels, constraint satisfaction boolean values, and display device capabilities. This parameter-based approach enables precise content allocation through systematic parameter comparison rather than complex computational algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If re-arbitration is performed when constraint expressions are not met, then the reliability of content display is improved, but the time required for content allocation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent display reliabilityVSAvoidcontent allocation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback through the re-arbitration mechanism that monitors whether constraint expressions are satisfied after initial content allocation. When constraints are violated, the system provides feedback by triggering re-arbitration to correct the allocation, ensuring reliable content display while limiting re-arbitration to only necessary cases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing re-arbitration only for specific content allocations that violate constraint expressions, rather than re-evaluating all content allocations. This selective re-arbitration approach maintains display reliability for affected content while minimizing the time overhead of the re-arbitration process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11443720B2Display control apparatus, display control method, and computer-readable storage medium
Publication Date: 2022.09.13 DENSO CORP
  • US11443720B2 patent drawing
  • US11443720B2 patent drawing
  • US11443720B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An application issues a display request to display a content in an area set on a display device. In response to determining that a different content is displayed in the area, an arbitration is executed to allocate the content to the area to satisfy a rule-based arbitration using a rule definition including (i) an arbitration policy defining a basic arbitration when allocating the content to the area on the display device and (ii) a constraint expression describing a property to be exceptionally satisfied.