Image Display Control Device Adaptive Luminance and Chroma Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image display control devices face challenges in simultaneously reducing luminance to conserve power and correct image quality, especially in real-time applications like streaming images, as they often result in image deterioration and flicker due to inadequate consideration of chroma and high-speed processing requirements.

Innovation Solution

An image display control device that includes a statistical information acquisition section, a common calculator for real-time luminance and correction coefficient generation, a code storage section for operation procedures, and a decoder to manage code output, enabling adaptive luminance reduction and image correction while minimizing circuit size and power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a look-up table (LUT) is used to simplify calculations for luminance reduction and image correction, then calculation complexity is reduced, but processing speed decreases due to memory access time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation complexityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-calculates and stores correction coefficients in a look-up table (LUT) during a setup phase, so that during real-time processing, only simple table lookups are needed instead of complex calculations. This preliminary preparation enables fast real-time processing by replacing computationally intensive operations with simple memory access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the balance between using pre-calculated LUT data and performing real-time calculations based on the specific processing requirements. For standard cases, it uses the LUT for speed, while for special cases requiring higher precision or adaptability, it performs additional calculations, thus optimizing the trade-off between speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If dedicated hardware is used to perform parallel calculations for high-speed processing, then processing speed increases, but circuit area and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a multi-functional processing unit that can perform both LUT-based fast processing and full calculation operations using the same hardware resources. This universal processor eliminates the need for separate dedicated hardware circuits for different processing modes, thereby reducing overall circuit area and power consumption while maintaining high-speed capability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the processing parameters dynamically by switching between different processing modes (LUT-based mode vs. full calculation mode) based on the application requirements. This allows the system to achieve high-speed processing when necessary while consuming minimal power during normal operation, effectively managing the speed-power trade-off.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If lighting luminance is reduced adaptively to decrease power consumption, then power consumption decreases, but image quality deteriorates due to chroma impairment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism that continuously monitors image quality metrics (including chroma) and adjusts the luminance reduction level accordingly. When chroma deterioration is detected, the system reduces the luminance reduction amount or applies compensatory corrections, ensuring that power consumption is minimized while maintaining acceptable image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes multiple parameters simultaneously, including luminance reduction level, correction coefficient strength, and processing intensity, to optimize the balance between power consumption and image quality. By adjusting these parameters dynamically based on content analysis, the system achieves energy efficiency without significant quality loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If lighting luminance changes quickly to follow luminance changes in the display image, then luminance tracking accuracy improves, but flicker occurs causing image quality deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveluminance tracking accuracyVSAvoidflicker
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies temporal filtering that processes luminance changes at controlled intervals rather than instantaneously. By updating the luminance reduction level at optimized time intervals and using smoothing algorithms, the system tracks luminance changes accurately while avoiding rapid fluctuations that cause visible flicker, thus resolving the contradiction between tracking accuracy and flicker suppression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS7990402B2Image display control device
Publication Date: 2011.08.02 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US7990402B2 patent drawing
  • US7990402B2 patent drawing
  • US7990402B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image display control device calculates a lighting luminance after reduction in luminance and an image correction coefficient by real-time calculations of a common calculator. The common calculator is controlled by microcodes stored in a code table. When correcting an image, chroma correction is enhanced to suppress a decrease in chroma due reduction in luminance, and a flicker is prevented by series infinite impulse response (IIR) filtering processes. When the image has a low average luminance but has a high chroma, a decrease in chroma is suppressed by limiting a reduction in lighting luminance.