Display Panel Gate Timing for Multi-Stage Light Emission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The effective pulse width of the light-emitting control signal in display panels is limited, leading to restricted light-emitting duration and potential display flicker due to concentrated light emission within one frame time.

Innovation Solution

The display panel is designed with a cascaded shift register unit structure that includes driving and gating modules, where pixel circuit rows have at least two light-emitting stages within one frame time, and the time interval between adjacent stages is set to t*m, with m>n, ensuring uniform light emission by equalizing the time interval between start moments of adjacent light emissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of moving object

If the effective pulse width of the light-emitting control signal is increased to extend light-emitting duration, then the light-emitting time of sub-pixel is improved, but the display flicker problem occurs due to concentrated light emission within one frame time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight-emitting durationVSAvoiddisplay flicker
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the light-emitting process into multiple discrete stages within one frame time. Each pixel circuit row performs light emission in separate stages (first light-emitting stage, second light-emitting stage, etc.), with time intervals between stages. This segmentation distributes the light emission temporally, preventing concentrated emission that causes flicker while maintaining sufficient total light-emitting duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic light-emitting stages for each pixel circuit row. The light emission occurs in repeated cycles with fixed time intervals (t*m) between adjacent stages. This periodic action ensures uniform light emission over time, as the light-emitting device emits light at regular intervals rather than in a single concentrated burst, thereby eliminating display flicker.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Duration of action of moving object

If multiple light-emitting stages are implemented within one frame time to extend light-emitting duration, then the light-emitting time is improved, but the time interval control becomes complex to avoid display flicker

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight-emitting durationVSAvoidtime interval control
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes a specific mathematical relationship for the time interval between adjacent light-emitting stages: the interval is set to t*m, where t is the row time and m is a coefficient greater than the number of gating signal lines n. This parameter change provides a clear, calculable rule for timing control, simplifying the implementation of multiple light-emitting stages while ensuring uniform light emission and avoiding flicker.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different timing parameters to different pixel circuit rows based on their position and the gating signal line they are connected to. Each row has its light-emitting stages scheduled with specific time intervals relative to its row time, creating localized timing control that adapts to the specific configuration of each row while maintaining overall system coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Duration of action of moving object

If the number of gating signal lines is increased to provide more light-emitting control signals, then the light-emitting duration is improved, but the signal line complexity and potential for display non-uniformity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight-emitting durationVSAvoidgating signal lines
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes each gating signal line multi-functional by having it control multiple shift register units that drive different pixel circuit rows. Instead of dedicating one gating signal line to one row, the same gating signal line is reused across multiple rows in a cyclic pattern. This universality reduces the total number of gating signal lines needed while still enabling coordinated control of multiple light-emitting stages across the display.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of assigning one gating signal line to each pixel circuit row (the conventional approach), the patent inverts the assignment: multiple pixel circuit rows share a common gating signal line. This inversion reduces the number of signal lines required from N (one per row) to n (where n < N), simplifying the signal line structure while maintaining control capability through the cyclic sharing arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS20260094561A1Display panel and display apparatus
Publication Date: 2026.04.02 TIANMA ADVANCED DISPLAY TECH INST (XIAMEN) CO LTD
  • US20260094561A1 patent drawing
  • US20260094561A1 patent drawing
  • US20260094561A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a display panel and a display apparatus. The display panel includes shift register units, n gating signal lines, and N pixel circuit rows. An output terminal of a driving module in an i-th shift register unit is connected to one input terminal of a driving module in an (i+1)-th shift register unit. The gating module in a shift register unit is configured to receive at least signals from a corresponding driving module and a corresponding gating signal line, and output a control signal. An operating mode of the display panel includes: a pixel circuit row includes at least two light-emitting stages within a first time, wherein a duration of the first time is equal to a duration of one frame time, and a time interval between two adjacent light-emitting stages is t*m, where t is row time, T is one frame time, and m&gt;n.