Video Display Power Control via Source Activity Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Video display apparatus, such as TV receivers, may inadvertently power off during user interaction with a source apparatus like a game machine due to misinterpretation of inactivity, leading to user inconvenience.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a status information acquisition module to determine the activity status of the source apparatus via HDMI-CEC commands, and a power controller to maintain the video display apparatus active as long as the source apparatus is active, using a sleep timer to manage power states based on user interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the video display apparatus uses a power saving function to power off after a prescribed time without user manipulation, then energy consumption is reduced, but the apparatus may inadvertently power off during user interaction with source apparatus

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidpower state stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The video display apparatus monitors the activity status of the source apparatus through feedback signals (such as HDMI-CEC commands) and adjusts its power state accordingly. When the source apparatus is detected as active, the video display apparatus maintains its power-on state even though no direct user manipulation has occurred, preventing inadvertent power-off while still enabling power-saving functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The activity status of the source apparatus serves as an intermediary indicator of user interaction. Instead of directly detecting user manipulation of the video display apparatus, the system uses the source apparatus's activity status as a mediator to infer whether the user is engaged in an activity that should prevent power-off.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the video display apparatus monitors user manipulation directly to prevent power-off, then power state reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower state stabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The source apparatus performs self-monitoring of its own activity status and actively reports this information to the video display apparatus. This eliminates the need for the video display apparatus to implement complex direct monitoring of user manipulation, as the source apparatus handles its own status tracking and communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The activity status monitoring function is already present in the source apparatus for its own control purposes. By utilizing this existing multi-functional capability to also serve the video display apparatus's power management needs, the system avoids adding separate dedicated monitoring hardware or complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8854547B2Video display apparatus, source apparatus, video display method, and video display system
Publication Date: 2014.10.07 HISENSE VISUAL TECH CO LTD
  • US8854547B2 patent drawing
  • US8854547B2 patent drawing
  • US8854547B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, there is provided a video display apparatus, including: a video display unit configured to display a video by receiving a video signal output from a source apparatus; a status information acquisition module configured to acquire, from the source apparatus, status information indicating whether the source apparatus is active or inactive; and a power controller configured to perform a control of powering off the video display apparatus if the acquired status information indicates that the source apparatus is inactive.