Disposable Endoscope Valve Assembly for Leak-Resistant Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing endoscope valve systems are prone to failure, leak, and are difficult to use due to fragile components, complex user interfaces, and lack of feedback, leading to unreliable and inefficient fluid flow control, which affects the dependability and usability of endoscopic procedures.

Innovation Solution

A valve set and interface mechanism comprising a primary control valve, air input valve, and atmospheric valve, with biasing members and a user interface mechanism that provides intuitive control of fluid flow through an endoscope, including tactile feedback and simplified assembly, to improve reliability and operator experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing endoscope valve systems are used, then fluid flow control is achieved, but the system is prone to failure and leakage due to fragile components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve system reliabilityVSAvoidcomponent fragility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The valve system is divided into modular components including a valve body, valve member, and biasing member assembly. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently for strength and reliability, reducing the fragility issues in existing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A biasing member is pre-installed to provide continuous elastic support to the valve member, cushioning it against mechanical shocks and preventing premature failure. This prior cushioning ensures the valve maintains reliability under varying operational stresses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Ease of operation

If complex user interfaces are used for valve control, then precise fluid flow control is achieved, but the system becomes difficult to use with steep learning curves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve control easeVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valve member is designed to automatically respond to user input through a simple interface mechanism, eliminating the need for complex manual adjustments. The biasing member provides automatic feedback, allowing the valve to self-regulate flow based on user actuation, thereby simplifying operation while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple valves are used to control different fluid flows, then comprehensive fluid control is achieved, but the assembly and manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid flow control versatilityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple valve functions are merged into a single integrated valve body with a common biasing member assembly. The valve member can selectively control different fluid pathways (e.g., to balloon, to pump, to atmosphere) through a unified mechanism, reducing the number of separate components and simplifying manufacturing and assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The valve member is designed as a multi-functional component that can direct fluid flow to multiple destinations depending on its position. This universal design allows a single valve assembly to perform the functions of multiple specialized valves, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides reliable and intuitive control of fluid flow, reducing learning curves and manufacturing complexity, enhancing the usability and efficiency of endoscopic procedures by ensuring accurate and ergonomic operation of endoscope valves.

Implementation Method 1

The one or more biasing members may comprise first, second, and third biasing members... The first biasing member may comprise a pressure differential between a portion of the atmospheric valve and the atmospheric channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The first biasing member may comprise a pressure differential between a portion of the atmospheric valve and the atmospheric channel created by configuring the valve set to place the air input channel in fluid communication with the atmospheric channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS12161291B2Devices, systems, and methods for endoscope valve control
Publication Date: 2024.12.10 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED INC
  • US12161291B2 patent drawing
  • US12161291B2 patent drawing
  • US12161291B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments are generally directed to devices, systems, and methods for controlling the flow of fluids in endoscopic systems, such as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) enabled endoscopes. Some embodiments are particularly directed to valve sets and/or valve interface mechanisms for controlling air, water, and/or suction flow through a valve well for an endoscopic system. Several embodiments are directed to user interface mechanisms and techniques for enabling an operator to interact with and control endoscope valves. Many embodiments are directed to mechanisms and techniques for translating interface input motion into valve control motions. In one or more embodiments, the valve sets and/or valve interface mechanisms may be disposable.