Disposable Component Reader for Fluid Processing Medical Apparatus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fluid processing medical apparatuses for extracorporeal blood treatment require users to navigate complex therapy selection menus and risk incorrect disposable component usage, leading to potential errors and increased usability challenges.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves positioning a disposable component relative to a reader unit, reading component-related information, matching it with stored data, and providing a limited selection of suitable therapies to the user, eliminating the need for error alarms and reducing the complexity of therapy selection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a user first selects the final therapy in all details on a first screen, then the therapy selection is comprehensive, but the user is confronted with a high number of different therapies and combinations, increasing complexity and difficulty of operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapy selection comprehensivenessVSAvoiduser operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The reader unit automatically reads component information from the disposable component before the user needs to make therapy selections. This preliminary action of automatically acquiring component data eliminates the need for the user to manually navigate through all possible therapy options, as the system has already processed the component information and is ready to present only relevant therapies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The therapy selection process is segmented into two stages: first, the system automatically reads component information and determines suitable therapies; second, the user selects from a pre-filtered list of suitable therapies. This segmentation separates the complex information processing task (performed automatically by the system) from the decision-making task (performed by the user), reducing the cognitive load and number of options the user must evaluate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the system provides an alarm when a disposable component is not suitable, then incorrect component usage is prevented, but the setup process becomes more complex and requires error handling procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent compatibility assuranceVSAvoidsetup procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of treating component incompatibility as an error condition requiring alarm messages and error handling, the system converts this potential problem into a beneficial feature by automatically filtering out incompatible therapies. The reader unit reads component information and the controller automatically determines suitable therapies, transforming what could be a harmful error state into a useful pre-screening mechanism that guides the user toward correct therapy selections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The reader unit and controller act as intermediaries between the disposable component and the therapy selection process. Rather than directly presenting all possible therapies to the user or requiring manual verification, the reader unit automatically captures component information and the controller processes this data to determine compatibility, serving as an intermediary layer that simplifies the interaction and ensures reliability without adding complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If all therapy information is displayed to the user, then complete information is provided, but a long and complete list requires a wide overview and increases the time needed to find suitable options

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidtherapy selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and displays only the relevant subset of therapy information based on the read component data. Rather than presenting a long and complete list of all possible therapies, the controller determines suitable therapies from the component information and presents only those options to the user. This extraction of relevant information maintains completeness of suitable options while eliminating unnecessary choices that would increase selection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10861607B2Method for setting up a fluid processing medical apparatus
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 B BRAUN AVITUM
  • US10861607B2 patent drawing
  • US10861607B2 patent drawing
  • US10861607B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for setting-up a fluid processing medical apparatus, the method includes: a) positioning a disposable component intended to be used for therapy with the fluid processing medical apparatus relative to a reader unit by a user; b) reading component related information provided on the disposable component by the reader unit; c) matching the read component related information with component related data stored in a database; and d) providing a selection of suitable therapies for the disposable component to the user based on the matching.