Dissimilar Microcontrollers for Aircraft Outflow Valve Redundancy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cabin pressure control systems in aircraft face challenges in maintaining optimal pressure due to the risk of simultaneous failure of identical microcontrollers, which can lead to undesirably high or low cabin pressure if both fail, lacking redundancy for outflow valve operation during flight or post-landing situations.

Innovation Solution

Implementing two dissimilar microcontrollers for controlling outflow valve motors, each with separate power sources and built-in test logic, to reduce the likelihood of simultaneous failure and ensure continued safe operation by allowing independent control of the outflow valve even if one microcontroller fails.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If identical microcontrollers are used for controlling outflow valve motors, then device complexity is reduced and ease of manufacture is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to the risk of simultaneous failure

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by using two different types of microcontrollers (first microcontroller and second microcontroller with different architectures or manufacturers) to control the outflow valve motors. This asymmetric design ensures that a failure mode affecting one microcontroller type will not necessarily affect the other, thereby improving system reliability while accepting increased device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the control system into two independent control paths, each with its own microcontroller and motor. This segmentation creates functional redundancy where each microcontroller can independently control its associated motor to operate the outflow valve, ensuring that if one control path fails, the other remains operational

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If dissimilar microcontrollers with separate power sources are implemented, then reliability is improved by reducing simultaneous failure risk, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning by incorporating built-in test logic within each microcontroller that continuously monitors system health and detects potential failures before they occur. This proactive fault detection and isolation mechanism cushions against complete system failure, maintaining reliability while the separate power sources and dissimilar microcontrollers address the manufacturing complexity through standardized modular designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS11591092B2Dissimilar microcontrollers for outflow valve
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11591092B2 patent drawing
  • US11591092B2 patent drawing
  • US11591092B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, a cabin pressure control and monitoring system includes an outflow valve, a first motor configured to operate the outflow valve to release fluid from a cabin, and a second motor configured to operate the outflow valve to release fluid from the cabin. The cabin pressure control and monitoring system also includes a first microcontroller configured to automatically control the first motor based on a pressure of the fluid in the cabin. The cabin pressure control and monitoring system further includes a second microcontroller configured to control the second motor based on user input and monitor the pressure of the fluid in the cabin. In some examples, a type of the first microcontroller is different than a type of the second microcontroller.