Distance Measurement Correction Using Reliability-Scored Depth Data
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing distance measurement systems in vehicles suffer from errors due to camera deformation and environmental influences, and using a secondary measurement unit for correction requires high accuracy and may not be suitable in all scenes, leading to potential inaccuracies and reduced correction probability.
Innovation Solution
A distance measurement device that includes first and second acquisition units to acquire distance information, a first correction value generation unit to calculate corrections based on second distance information, a reliability score determination unit to assess the reliability of these corrections, and a correction unit to apply reliable corrections within a valid time interval.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If a second distance measurement unit is used to correct the distance measurement camera, then distance measurement accuracy can be improved, but the second distance measurement unit requires higher distance accuracy and may not be suitable in all scenes
Solution Approach 1:
The patent uses image data from the same camera that is being corrected, rather than requiring a separate high-precision distance measurement unit. The system processes multiple images taken at different times to extract distance information, effectively using readily available data instead of expensive additional hardware. This resolves the contradiction by achieving correction without requiring a second high-accuracy measurement device that would have limited scene adaptability.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates virtual distance measurement data by processing image data through optical flow calculations and depth map generation. Instead of relying on physical second measurement hardware, the system generates synthetic distance information from image sequences, copying the essential measurement function through computational methods. This allows the correction to work across various scenes without the constraints of additional physical sensors.
2Measurement precision
If a high reliability threshold is set for correction, then correction accuracy is maintained, but the probability of correction being performed is significantly reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic threshold adjustment based on scene conditions and data quality. Rather than using a fixed high reliability threshold, the system adapts the correction acceptance criteria according to the specific situation, including factors like scene complexity, object characteristics, and data quality metrics. This dynamic approach maintains correction accuracy when conditions are favorable while allowing more corrections to be applied when conditions permit, thus resolving the contradiction between accuracy and correction probability.
Solution Approach 2:
The system changes multiple parameters simultaneously to balance accuracy and correction probability: it adjusts the reliability threshold based on scene characteristics, modifies the valid time interval according to camera stability conditions, and varies the correction strength based on confidence levels. These parameter changes allow the system to maintain high accuracy standards while increasing the overall rate of successful corrections by adapting to different operational contexts.
3Reliability
If multiple correction values are generated over time, then correction reliability can be improved, but the risk of using outdated or inaccurate correction values increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent performs preliminary validation of correction values before applying them to distance measurements. The system pre-processes correction data by checking validity conditions, including time interval constraints, scene consistency, and quality metrics, before the actual correction is applied. This preliminary action ensures that only reliable correction values are stored and used, maintaining both correction reliability and accuracy by filtering out potentially outdated or inaccurate values in advance.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements feedback mechanisms where each generated correction value is evaluated against previous corrections and current scene conditions. The validity determination unit uses feedback from multiple sources including temporal consistency checks, spatial coherence analysis, and comparison with expected distance ranges to accept or reject correction values. This feedback loop ensures that correction reliability is maintained over time while preventing the use of outdated or inaccurate corrections by continuously validating against current conditions.
Data Source
AI summary
A distance measurement device includes: a first acquisition unit configured to acquire first distance information; a second acquisition unit configured to acquire second distance information; a first correction value generation unit configured to calculate a first correction value for correcting the first distance information based on the second distance information; a reliability score determination unit configured to calculate a reliability score indicating a reliability of the first correction value and determine the reliability of the first correction value based on the reliability score; a second correction value generation unit configured to generate a second correction value from the first correction value whose reliability score is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold and which is acquired within a predetermined valid time interval; and a correction unit configured to correct the first distance information using the second correction value.


