Confined-Space Tool Localization with 3D Model Distance Matching
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing localization methods for mobile remote inspection and manipulation tools in confined spaces are inefficient due to reliance on heavy and power-intensive sensors, odometry errors, and lack of global localization systems, leading to inaccurate pose determination and increased complexity.
Innovation Solution
A localization method using small and simple sensors, such as time-of-flight distance sensors and inertial measurement units, that access a pre-existing 3D environment model to simulate distance measurements and determine the pose of the tool within the confined space, eliminating the need for external references and reducing sensor complexity.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If multiple sensors (cameras, 3D scanning sensors, ultrasound sensors, structured light profiling sensors, wheel encoders, inertial units) are used for localization and navigation, then the localization accuracy and navigation capability are improved, but the device weight and power consumption increase significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts and removes unnecessary sensors from the system. Instead of using multiple heavy sensors (cameras, 3D scanning sensors, ultrasound sensors, structured light profiling sensors, wheel encoders, inertial units), the invention retains only the essential distance sensor and pose sensor, eliminating the burden of redundant components while maintaining localization functionality.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses a pre-existing 3D environment model (a copy of the physical space) to simulate distance measurements and determine device pose. This virtual model replaces the need for multiple physical sensors, allowing the system to achieve accurate localization through computational methods rather than hardware multiplication.
2Measurement precision
If multiple sensors (cameras, 3D scanning sensors, ultrasound sensors, structured light profiling sensors, wheel encoders, inertial units) are used for localization and navigation, then the localization accuracy and navigation capability are improved, but the power consumption increases significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts and removes power-intensive sensors from the system. By eliminating cameras, 3D scanning sensors, ultrasound sensors, structured light profiling sensors, wheel encoders, and inertial units, the invention dramatically reduces power consumption while retaining only the essential distance sensor and pose sensor needed for localization.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses a pre-existing 3D environment model to simulate distance measurements computationally. This approach replaces power-intensive physical sensing with lower-power computational processing, achieving accurate localization through software-based methods rather than hardware-intensive approaches.
3Adaptability or versatility
If wheel encoders and inertial units are used for odometry-based localization, then the device can determine its position without external references, but odometry errors accumulate over time leading to distorted pose calculation
Solution Approach 1:
The patent uses a pre-existing 3D environment model (a virtual copy of the physical space) to simulate distance measurements and determine device pose. This computational approach replaces odometry-based localization, eliminating error accumulation while maintaining independence from external references like GPS or visual features.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces the mechanical odometry system (wheel encoders and inertial units) with a computational system based on distance sensor measurements and 3D environment model matching. This substitution eliminates the error accumulation inherent in mechanical integration while achieving comparable or superior localization accuracy.
4Device complexity
If a pre-existing 3D environment model is used to simulate distance measurements and determine pose, then sensor complexity and device weight are reduced, but the system requires accurate environmental modeling beforehand
Solution Approach 1:
The patent performs the environmental modeling action in advance, creating a pre-existing 3D environment model before the actual localization task. This preliminary action captures the geometric structure of the space, which then serves as a reference for all subsequent localization operations, eliminating the need for real-time complex processing.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates a virtual copy of the physical environment (3D environment model) that can be reused multiple times for localization. This one-time modeling effort produces a reusable reference that simplifies all subsequent localization tasks, trading initial modeling effort for ongoing operational simplicity.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This approach enables precise localization of mobile remote inspection and manipulation tools in confined spaces without external references, reducing sensor weight and power requirements, and improving accuracy by using sensor fusion techniques like Monte Carlo localization and particle filtering.
Implementation Method 1
time-of-flight distance sensors
Implementation Method 2
inertial measurement units
Data Source
AI summary
A localization method and system for mobile remote inspection and/or manipulation tools in confined spaces are provided. The system comprises a mobile remote inspection and/or manipulation device including a carrier movable within the confined space and an inspection and/or manipulation tool, such as an inspection camera, pose sensors arranged on the movable carrier for providing signals indicative of the position and orientation of the movable carrier, and distance sensors arranged on the movable carrier for providing signals indicative of the distance to interior surfaces of the confined space. The localization method makes use of probalistic sensor fusion of the measurement data provided by the pose sensors and the distance sensors in order to precisely determine the actual pose of the movable carrier and localize data generated by the inspection and/or manipulation tool.


