Distance Protection Security Under Transient Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Distance protection in electric power delivery systems faces challenges in accurately determining fault locations under transient conditions caused by system-impedance ratio (SIR) and capacitively-coupled voltage transformer (CCVT) transients, leading to noise-to-signal ratios that can result in incorrect fault detection and operation.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of additional security measures in the distance protection system, including determining the need for extra security based on voltage magnitude and fault proximity, applying time delays or reducing the protection zone reach, and using numerical filters to mitigate CCVT-induced transients, ensures accurate fault detection and secure operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If distance protection operates without additional security measures under transient conditions, then the response speed is fast, but the reliability deteriorates due to incorrect fault detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidfault detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The protection system dynamically adjusts its security measures based on detected transient conditions. When transients are detected, the system automatically applies additional security measures such as time delays or zone reach reduction. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain fast response during normal conditions while ensuring reliability during transient conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (time delay duration, zone reach distance) based on the detected transient state. During transient conditions, the protection zone reach is reduced or time delays are extended, effectively changing the protection parameters to prevent false tripping while maintaining proper protection coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If additional security measures are applied during transient conditions, then the reliability is improved, but the response time increases due to time delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoidprotection response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies security measures selectively rather than continuously. Additional security measures such as time delays or zone reach reduction are applied only partially - specifically during detected transient conditions - rather than being applied excessively during all operating conditions. This partial application maintains reliability when needed while minimizing impact on normal response times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of transient conditions before applying security measures. By detecting transients in advance and preparing the protection system accordingly, the transition to secure mode is smooth and minimizes additional time loss. The preliminary detection allows the system to anticipate when security measures will be needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the protection zone reach is reduced to enhance security, then the reliability is improved, but the coverage area decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection securityVSAvoidprotection zone coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The protection zone reach is dynamically adjusted based on operating conditions. During transient conditions, the zone reach is temporarily reduced to prevent false tripping on external faults. During normal conditions, the full protection zone reach is maintained to ensure complete coverage. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to maintain both security and adequate coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The protection system segments the protection zone into different operational configurations. The full protection zone is divided into a secure reduced zone (applied during transients) and a full coverage zone (applied during normal conditions). This segmentation allows the system to switch between different coverage levels appropriate to the operating state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10641815B2Secure distance protection of electric power delivery systems under transient conditions
Publication Date: 2020.05.05 SCHWEITZER ENGINEERING LABORATORIES INC
  • US10641815B2 patent drawing
  • US10641815B2 patent drawing
  • US10641815B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A secure distance protection for electric power delivery systems under transient conditions is disclosed herein. Upon detection of a transient condition, additional security is added to a distance protection element before a protective action is taken. The transient condition may be detected when an angle of advancement of an operating signal is outside of a predetermined threshold. An unsecure condition may also be detected before applying additional security. The unsecure condition may be detected based on an estimation of a fault within a close-in zone and a voltage magnitude falling below a threshold.