Distance-Based Quality Score for Geospatial-Temporal Semantic Graphs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer systems are inadequate for efficiently identifying objects of interest in geospatial-temporal semantic graphs due to the challenge of distinguishing between numerous matches, where it is difficult to determine which matches are most similar to a given search template.

Innovation Solution

A distance-based quality score method is implemented, where a processor specifies a subgraph search template with nodes and edges, defines allowable and preferred ranges for attributes, and computes quality scores for each match based on attribute distances, allowing for the sorting of matches by their similarity to the template.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a computer searches for objects of interest in geospatial-temporal semantic graphs using traditional methods, then it can find matches, but it cannot effectively distinguish which matches are most similar to the search template

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimilarity measurement precisionVSAvoidobject identification ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces quality score parameters (required quality score and optional quality score) to transform the match identification process. By calculating distance-based quality scores for each match and sorting them in descending order, the system enables computers to objectively identify the most similar matches without human intervention, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary quality score calculation mechanism that bridges the gap between raw match data and meaningful similarity assessment. The quality score acts as a mediator that quantifies the similarity between matches and search templates, allowing computers to automatically rank and identify the most relevant objects without requiring human judgment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the system returns all matches without ranking, then completeness is maintained, but the workload increases and usability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidnumber of matches to review
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the most relevant matches from the complete set by sorting them according to quality scores. Instead of presenting all matches equally, the system extracts and prioritizes the top-ranked matches that most closely resemble the search template, thereby reducing the quantity of matches users need to review while maintaining processing completeness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality assessment by differentiating between required nodes and optional nodes in the search template. By calculating separate quality scores for required and optional node matches and combining them with appropriate weighting, the system provides a nuanced ranking that reflects the varying importance of different match components, improving productivity without sacrificing review quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10769158B2Computer processing through distance-based quality score method in geospatial-temporal semantic graphs
Publication Date: 2020.09.08 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA LLC
  • US10769158B2 patent drawing
  • US10769158B2 patent drawing
  • US10769158B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method of improving processing of overhead image data by a processor using a distance-based quality score in a geospatial-temporal semantic graph. An allowable range for each attribute in the subgraph search template is defined. For each match in a comparison, attribute values of each match element are compared against the preferred range and the allowable range to compute a corresponding distance of each match attribute from the subgraph search template. A corresponding overall match quality score is determined for each match from the subgraph search template, wherein determining the corresponding overall match qualities is performed using a corresponding required quality score and a corresponding optional quality score. All corresponding overall match quality scores are sorted into an ordered list and then displayed.