Vehicle Distance Sensing Reliability Under Noise and Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicles' monitoring devices, such as radar sensors, are prone to disturbances from noise, interference, and severe weather conditions, leading to unreliable distance measurements.

Innovation Solution

A computer system in vehicles determines the reliability of distance measurements by analyzing differences between sequential data samples and the number of unmeasured distances within a set time period, using threshold values to distinguish between noise-induced errors and legitimate object movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If monitoring devices are used to measure distance to objects, then vehicle surroundings can be monitored, but measurement reliability deteriorates due to noise, interference, and severe weather conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoidnoise and interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of sequential distance measurements to detect patterns indicating noise or interference before making a final reliability determination. By examining multiple sequential samples and calculating differences between them, the system proactively identifies measurement issues before they affect vehicle control decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors measurement quality by comparing sequential distance samples and provides feedback on measurement reliability. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adjust its trust in measurements based on detected patterns of noise or interference, improving overall measurement reliability in adverse conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If threshold values are used to filter measurements, then measurement reliability improves, but false rejection of legitimate measurements increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoidfalse rejection of legitimate measurements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic thresholding by comparing differences between sequential measurements rather than applying a fixed threshold. This dynamic approach adapts to changing conditions and object motion, reducing false rejection of legitimate measurements while maintaining reliability filtering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter being analyzed from absolute distance values to differences between sequential measurements. This parameter transformation allows the system to detect noise patterns while preserving legitimate measurements that show consistent change patterns, reducing false rejections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple sequential data samples are analyzed, then measurement reliability improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system analyzes only the necessary number of sequential samples required to detect noise patterns, rather than processing all available data. By calculating differences between a limited set of sequential measurements, the system achieves sufficient reliability assessment with minimal processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the analysis into discrete difference calculations between sequential samples, allowing for efficient processing. This segmented approach breaks down the complex task of reliability assessment into simple, fast-computing difference operations that can be performed in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260056306A1Determining distances to objects
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 VOLVO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AB
  • US20260056306A1 patent drawing
  • US20260056306A1 patent drawing
  • US20260056306A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system of a vehicle configured to monitor vehicle surroundings is provided. The computer system comprises processing circuitry configured to acquire data samples from a monitoring device configured to measure a distance to an object located within a field of view of the monitoring device, determine a difference between at least two sequential data samples of the measured distance from the monitoring device to the object, and if said difference exceeds a set first threshold value, determine a number of distances within an operating range of the monitoring device to the object that are not measured by the monitoring device during a set time period. The measured distance to the object is not relied upon if the number of distances that are not measured during the set time period is below a set second threshold value.