Distracted Driving Event Clustering for Driver-Passenger Phone Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems inaccurately distinguish between distracted driving events involving the driver and passenger phone usage, leading to unreliable risk assessments for personal injury and property loss.

Innovation Solution

A distracted driving analysis system employing unsupervised, semi-supervised, and supervised machine learning techniques to cluster and label driving and phone usage data, using features like sudden braking and phone interactions to differentiate between driver and passenger events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current systems monitor phone usage to detect distracted driving, then distracted driving detection capability is provided, but accuracy in distinguishing driver phone usage from passenger phone usage deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistracted driving detection capabilityVSAvoidaccuracy in distinguishing driver vs passenger phone usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments phone usage events into distinct categories by analyzing multiple features simultaneously. It divides driving events into clusters (e.g., distracted driving vs. passenger usage) by segmenting the data based on phone interaction patterns, vehicle dynamics, and contextual features, thereby improving classification accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different analysis methods to different aspects of phone usage data. It examines local characteristics such as phone interaction timing, duration, intensity, and correlation with specific driving events to accurately determine whether phone usage occurred during distracted driving or passenger activities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If phone usage monitoring is used to assess driver risk, then risk assessment functionality is provided, but reliability of risk quantification deteriorates due to inaccurate identification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment functionalityVSAvoidreliability of risk quantification
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where classification results are continuously refined. It uses labeled training data to train machine learning models, and the models provide feedback by improving their classification accuracy over time, thereby enhancing the reliability of risk quantification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces simple rule-based detection mechanisms with advanced machine learning algorithms. It substitutes traditional mechanical monitoring approaches with intelligent systems that can learn from data patterns, improving the reliability of risk assessment through semi-supervised and supervised learning techniques

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12509094B2Systems and methods for identifying distracted driving events using semi-supervised clustering
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 QUANATA LLC
  • US12509094B2 patent drawing
  • US12509094B2 patent drawing
  • US12509094B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A distracted driving analysis system for identifying distracted driving events is provided. The system includes a processor in communication with a memory device programmed to: (i) receive driving event records, each driving event record including phone usage by a user, wherein a driving event record is labeled as an actual distracted driving event or a passenger event, (ii) divide the driving event records into at least two clusters based at least in part upon common features and the labels of each driving event record by processing the plurality of driving event records with a semi-supervised machine learning algorithm, (iii) generate a trained model based at least in part upon the at least two clusters, (iv) process a new driving event using the trained model, (v) assign the new driving event to one of the clusters using the trained model, and/or (vi) determine whether the new driving event is an actual distracted driving event or a passenger event.