Distributed Actuator Units for Aerodynamic Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Active flow control systems for aerodynamic surfaces require a massive compressed air source unit and extensive plumbing, leading to increased weight, pressure drop, and geometric constraints, which counteract the benefits of reduced drag and increased lift.

Innovation Solution

Aerodynamic flow control system with integrated actuator units featuring electrically powered compressors, transitional components, and feedback-free fluidic oscillators that produce oscillating air flows, eliminating the need for a centralized air source and extensive plumbing, and allowing for flexible orientation and programmable control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a centralized compressed air source unit is used, then aerodynamic flow control can be achieved, but system weight increases due to extensive plumbing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic flow controlVSAvoidsystem weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized air source system into multiple distributed actuator units, each with its own miniaturized air source. This segmentation eliminates the need for extensive plumbing connecting a central source to multiple actuators, thereby reducing system weight while maintaining flow control functionality across the aerodynamic surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each actuator unit incorporates a local miniaturized air source positioned directly at the actuation location on the aerodynamic surface. This local quality approach eliminates long fluidic conduits and reduces weight by placing the air source where it is needed, rather than transporting compressed air from a remote centralized source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If extensive fluidic plumbing is used to distribute air, then compressed air can reach actuators, but pressure drop increases along the plumbing lines

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompressed air deliveryVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the air distribution network into independent actuator units, each with its own miniaturized air source. This eliminates long plumbing lines that cause pressure drops, as each unit generates and uses compressed air locally without requiring pressure maintenance over long fluidic conduits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the air source function from a centralized location and embeds it within each actuator unit. This removes the need for extensive plumbing infrastructure that would otherwise be required to deliver compressed air from a central source to multiple distributed actuators, thereby eliminating pressure drop issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Quantity of substance

If larger diameter pipes are used to compensate for pressure drop, then air delivery improves, but system weight and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair deliveryVSAvoidplumbing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the air delivery system into distributed actuator units with miniaturized air sources, eliminating the need for a complex network of large-diameter pipes. Each unit handles its own air delivery independently, simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining adequate air supply to each actuator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The complex plumbing infrastructure is extracted and replaced by integrating miniaturized air sources directly into each actuator unit. This eliminates the need for large-diameter pipes and complex fluidic distribution networks, reducing both weight and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If a centralized air source system is implemented, then flow control is achieved, but geometric constraints prevent arbitrary system configuration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow controlVSAvoidsystem configuration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the flow control system into independent actuator units that can be distributed across the aerodynamic surface. Each unit is self-contained with its own miniaturized air source, allowing flexible configuration and placement according to geometric constraints without requiring connection to a centralized air source through extensive plumbing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each actuator unit is designed as a self-contained local system with integrated miniaturized air source, enabling adaptation to various geometric configurations. This local quality approach allows the system to be tailored to specific geometric constraints while maintaining flow control functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

5Productivity

If matching compressor capability to actuator requirements is required, then system performance is optimized, but system design becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidsystem design
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the system into standardized actuator units with integrated miniaturized air sources. Each unit is designed as a self-contained module with matched compressor and actuator components, simplifying the design process while optimizing performance. The modular approach allows easy scaling and configuration without complex system-level matching calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system reduces weight and complexity while maintaining aerodynamic performance by providing efficient, flexible, and redundant active flow control, enabling reduced drag and increased lift without the penalties of traditional systems.

Implementation Method 1

an electrically powered compressor to compress air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

a feedback-free fluidic oscillator... that produces oscillating air flows

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidic oscillation:

Data Source

PatentUS11124290B2Integrated aerodynamic flow control system with air source
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 ADVANCED FLUIDICS LLC
  • US11124290B2 patent drawing
  • US11124290B2 patent drawing
  • US11124290B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aerodynamic flow control system includes a plurality of actuator units integrated at predetermined locations along a span of an aerodynamic surface of a vehicle to provide aerodynamic active air flow control, wherein each of the plurality of actuator units includes an electrically powered compressor to compress air; a transitional component to receive the compressed air from the compressor and provide two streams of the compressed air; and a fluidic oscillator having two inlet ports that receive the two streams of the compressed air, and an exit port that discharges a single oscillating flow of air at a predetermined velocity.