Distributed AI Task Execution Control with Reachability Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack dynamic distributed control and communication technologies for efficiently managing interrelated tasks with varying execution agent attributes, leading to inefficiencies in task execution strategies.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic directed activity network system with task execution agents, controllers, and a communications network that dynamically updates task execution agent attributes using optimization tools like graph theory, artificial intelligence, and fuzzy logic to optimize task execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If distributed control systems are implemented to manage interrelated tasks dynamically, then task execution efficiency and adaptability improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into multiple independent task execution agents distributed across different locations, each capable of autonomous task execution. This segmentation allows parallel processing of tasks while reducing the complexity burden on any single central controller, thereby improving overall productivity without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates continuous feedback mechanisms where task execution agents report their status, resource consumption, and completion to the directed activity controller. This feedback loop enables dynamic adjustment of task assignments and execution strategies in real-time, improving adaptability and efficiency while maintaining manageable complexity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic adjustment of execution strategies is implemented to accommodate unforeseen events, then adaptability improves, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to unforeseen eventsVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system transitions from static, pre-defined task sequences to dynamic execution strategies that can adapt in real-time. Task execution agents can be reassigned, tasks can be resequenced, and execution parameters can be adjusted on-the-fly based on unforeseen events, thereby improving adaptability while the distributed architecture manages control complexity through local autonomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes execution parameters such as task priority, resource allocation, and timing based on current system state and unforeseen events. This parameter-driven adaptability allows the system to respond flexibly to changing conditions without requiring complete redesign of control logic, thus improving versatility while managing complexity through parameterization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple task execution agents with varying attributes are deployed, then system versatility improves, but coordination complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem versatilityVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The directed activity controller is designed as a universal coordinator that can manage diverse task execution agents with varying attributes and capabilities. The controller provides standardized interfaces and protocols for task assignment, monitoring, and coordination, enabling the system to handle heterogeneity in agents while managing coordination complexity through abstraction and standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250292111A1Distributed Activity Control Systems For Artificial Intelligence Task Execution Direction Including Task Adjacency And Reachability Analysis
Publication Date: 2025.09.18 PEDERSEN ROBERT D
  • US20250292111A1 patent drawing
  • US20250292111A1 patent drawing
  • US20250292111A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A dynamic, distributed directed activity network comprising a directed activity control program specifying tasks to be executed including required individual task inputs and outputs, the required order of task execution, permitted parallelism in task execution, task adjacency to subsequent tasks, and reachability from each task to other tasks; a plurality of task execution agents, individual of said agents having a set of dynamically changing agent attributes and capable of executing different required tasks; a plurality of task execution controllers, each controller associated with one or more of the task execution agents with access to dynamically changing agent attributes; a directed activity controller for communicating with said task execution controllers for directing execution of said activity control program; and, a communications network supporting communication between said directed activity controller and task execution controllers for directing execution of said directed activity control program using selected task execution agents.