Distributed Base Station Configuration via Inter-Base Station Protocol

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual and centralized configuration of base stations in wireless communication networks are time-consuming, costly, and inefficient, often requiring additional infrastructure and hardware, and can lead to unnecessary downtime.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a distributed adaptive configuration method where base stations exchange configuration data using an inter-base station protocol (IBSP) to self-configure based on local and operational parameters, eliminating the need for external entities and infrastructure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If manual and centralized configuration methods are used for base stations, then configuration control and coordination are maintained, but configuration time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration timeVSAvoidconfiguration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Base stations automatically configure themselves by exchanging configuration data with neighboring base stations through IBSP interfaces, eliminating the need for manual configuration and reducing dependency on centralized configuration systems. Each base station independently determines its configuration parameters based on exchanged data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The configuration process is distributed across multiple base stations rather than being centralized. Each base station performs configuration tasks locally using exchanged data, segmenting the overall configuration workload and reducing the complexity burden on any single system component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If centralized configuration systems are deployed, then configuration coordination is achieved, but infrastructure cost and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration coordinationVSAvoidinfrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Base stations autonomously exchange configuration data and coordinate their configurations through direct peer-to-peer communication via IBSP interfaces, eliminating the need for centralized configuration servers and reducing infrastructure complexity while maintaining coordination reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The configuration coordination function is merged directly into the base station units themselves through the IBSP interface, combining the previously separate centralized coordination function with the distributed base station entities, thereby reducing overall system infrastructure requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If manual configuration procedures are followed, then configuration accuracy is maintained, but deployment speed and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Configuration data is exchanged and prepared in advance through IBSP interfaces before actual base station deployment or activation. This preliminary exchange of configuration information enables rapid deployment without time-consuming manual configuration procedures while maintaining accuracy through automated data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Base stations automatically process and apply configuration data received through IBSP interfaces, eliminating the need for manual configuration procedures and significantly accelerating deployment speed while maintaining configuration accuracy through automated validation and application processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If centralized configuration management is used, then network control is maintained, but adaptability to local conditions and network changes is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration adaptabilityVSAvoidconfiguration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each base station determines its configuration parameters locally based on exchanged configuration data and local network conditions, allowing configurations to be adapted to specific local requirements while maintaining overall network coordination through the standardized IBSP interface protocol.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The configuration system becomes dynamic as base stations can automatically update their configurations by exchanging new configuration data through IBSP interfaces when network conditions change or new base stations are added, enabling the network to adapt to changes without manual intervention or centralized reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240049055A1Distributed adaptive radio configuration
Publication Date: 2024.02.08 AVIAT U S
  • US20240049055A1 patent drawing
  • US20240049055A1 patent drawing
  • US20240049055A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are wireless communications systems including implementation of an adaptive distributed configuration of base stations. The base stations use an inter-base station protocol to exchange configuration data for use in configuring the base stations according to an identical solution independently determined by each of the base stations.