Distributed Base Station Fronthaul Precoding Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing distributed base station systems face challenges in efficiently managing fronthaul link capacity, especially with massive MIMO configurations, where the overhead of precoding coefficients dominates the fronthaul link traffic, and current split options either increase costs or limit coordination and scalability.

Innovation Solution

Decomposing precoding into two parts, with the BBU performing interference mitigation and the RRU concentrating energy, allowing for efficient use of fronthaul capacity and enabling full MIMO gain while allowing user-layer signal coordination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all precoding coefficients are calculated and transmitted from BBU to RRU, then full MIMO coordination and interference mitigation are achieved, but fronthaul link overhead increases dramatically

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMIMO coordination performanceVSAvoidfronthaul link overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The precoding function is segmented into two parts: interference mitigation precoding (IMP) performed at BBU and beamforming precoding (BF) performed at RRU. This segmentation allows the system to achieve full MIMO coordination through IMP while reducing fronthaul overhead by performing BF locally at RRU based on uplink channel estimates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The BBU performs interference mitigation precoding in advance on the downlink data signals before transmitting them to RRU. The RRU then applies beamforming precoding locally using preliminary channel estimates from uplink signals, eliminating the need to transmit all precoding coefficients over fronthaul

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If IFFT and CP addition are performed in RRU (split option 7-1), then fronthaul efficiency increases, but one bit stream per antenna still requires very high fronthaul capacity for massive MIMO

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefronthaul efficiencyVSAvoidfronthaul capacity requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the signal processing function by performing IFFT and CP addition at BBU rather than RRU. This changes the split option from 7-1 to effectively option 7-3, where only processed user-layer signals need to be transmitted over fronthaul, reducing the data volume significantly while maintaining processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

BBU performs preliminary signal processing including IFFT and CP addition before transmitting signals to RRU. This preliminary action reduces the complexity and data rate requirements at RRU, allowing efficient massive MIMO operation with reduced fronthaul capacity requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If BBU performs all baseband processing including precoding, then coordination between multiple RRUs is simplified, but RRU functionality is limited and system flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordination complexityVSAvoidRRU functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments baseband processing functions between BBU and RRU: BBU performs interference mitigation precoding and IFFT, while RRU performs beamforming precoding and signal transmission. This segmentation maintains coordination simplicity at BBU while enhancing RRU functionality and flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

BBU performs preliminary interference mitigation processing before sending signals to RRU, but leaves final beamforming and transmission decisions to RRU. This preliminary action approach maintains coordination simplicity while enabling RRU to adapt to local channel conditions and perform advanced functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3732794B1Methods, systems and units of a distributed base staton system for handling downlink communication
Publication Date: 2024.07.31 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • EP3732794B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3732794B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3732794B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

ABSTRACT A method is disclosed performed by an RRU (120) of a distributed base station system (100) of a wireless communication network, the distributed base station system (100) further comprises a BBU (110) connected to the RRU, the RRU (120) being connected to a plurality of antennas (121, 122, 123) through which the RRU transmits user-layer signals to a plurality of UEs (161, 162, 163). The method comprises sending information related to received uplink signals to the BBU so that the BBU can obtain a first part of precoding coefficients to be used for precoding digital user-layer signals. The method further comprises obtaining a second part of the precoding coefficients and receiving, from the BBU, the digital user-layer signals precoded using the first part of the precoding coefficients. The method further comprises precoding the received digital user- layer signals precoded with the first part of the precoding coefficients also with the second part of the precoding coefficients, and transmitting the user-layer signals to the plurality of UEs (161, 162, 163) via the plurality of antennas (121, 122, 123). (Fig. 2) P73684