Distributed Intelligent Building Fixtures for Scalable Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Centralized building control systems are prone to failures, are difficult to expand, and require excessive power, limiting their scalability and reliability, especially in emergency situations where decentralized control is necessary.

Innovation Solution

A distributed building control system where each fixture includes a controller and communication port, allowing for independent control and sharing of sensor or state information within logical groups, eliminating the need for a central control point and enabling easy expansion and redundancy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a centralized control system is used, then control decisions can be made at a single point, but the system becomes vulnerable to complete failure if the central controller fails and requires excessive power to operate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system structureVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized control system into multiple distributed intelligent fixtures, each with its own controller. Each fixture operates independently but can communicate with others, eliminating the single point of failure while maintaining coordinated control functionality across the building system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a communication network as an intermediary layer between fixtures, allowing distributed controllers to exchange information and coordinate actions without requiring a central controller. This mediator enables collaboration while preserving independence and reliability of individual units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If a centralized control system is used, then all decision making occurs at the controller, but expansion of the system becomes expensive and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized controlVSAvoidsystem scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into independent intelligent fixtures that can be individually added or removed from the network. Each fixture maintains autonomy and can function independently, allowing the system to scale organically without requiring complex reconfiguration or additional centralized infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each intelligent fixture is designed with universal capabilities to operate independently, communicate with other fixtures, and perform multiple functions (lighting, sensing, control). This multi-functionality allows any fixture to assume various roles in the system, facilitating easy expansion and adaptation to different building configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If redundant control points are introduced to improve reliability, then system reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding redundant control points to a centralized system, the patent segments the system into multiple independent intelligent fixtures. Each fixture serves as its own control point with full functionality, providing inherent redundancy without adding complexity to the overall control architecture. The distributed nature means failure of one fixture does not affect others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9002522B2Logical groupings of intelligent building fixtures
Publication Date: 2015.04.07 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC
  • US9002522B2 patent drawing
  • US9002522B2 patent drawing
  • US9002522B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatuses and systems of building control, are disclosed. One system includes a plurality of building fixtures and at least one sensor interfaced with at least one of the plurality of building fixtures. Further, each building fixture includes a communication port and a controller. For this embodiment, each controller is configured to independently control at least one of an environmental load or a security device, either receive or help designate the building fixture as belonging to a logical group of building fixtures, and share at least one of sensor or state information with other building fixtures within the logical group of building fixtures, through the communication port.