Distributed Communication Network with Blockchain Protocol Enforcement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication networks face issues with data ownership, control, and security, particularly in centralized systems where data is vulnerable to cyber-attacks and misuse, and in decentralized systems like Blockchain, where data replication and lack of defined ownership persist.

Innovation Solution

A distributed communication network with computing nodes assigned to each participant, where pre-defined rules govern data sharing and access control, published on a blockchain ledger for immutability and traceability. This network uses hashing, symmetric, and asymmetric encryption to ensure secure, decentralized communication and contextual data use, allowing participants to control their data and revoke access at any time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If data is stored in a centralized system, then data access and control are simplified, but data security and ownership control deteriorate due to single points of failure and lack of user control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata access controlVSAvoiddata security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments data storage and control across multiple distributed nodes rather than centralizing it. Each participant operates their own computing node that stores and processes data locally, eliminating the single point of failure while maintaining controlled access through cryptographic authentication and role-based permissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces cryptographic protocols and smart contracts as intermediaries between data owners and data users. These intermediaries enable secure data sharing and access control without requiring centralized trust, allowing participants to maintain ownership while granting controlled access to others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If data is replicated across all blockchain nodes, then data availability and decentralization are improved, but data ownership and security deteriorate due to indiscriminate replication

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata availabilityVSAvoiddata ownership control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by allowing different nodes to have different data availability characteristics based on their roles and permissions. Data is replicated selectively to specific nodes that have the appropriate cryptographic credentials and role-based permissions, rather than indiscriminately to all nodes, maintaining both availability and ownership control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes data replication dynamic through role-based access control and cryptographic authentication. Data availability changes dynamically based on participant roles, permissions, and authentication status, allowing the system to adapt data distribution to current security requirements while maintaining decentralization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If encryption is applied to protect data security, then data confidentiality is improved, but data usability and traceability deteriorate due to inability to track data usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata confidentialityVSAvoiddata usage traceability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through blockchain-based logging and smart contracts that automatically record data access and usage events. When encrypted data is accessed, the system generates cryptographic proofs and logs usage information on the blockchain, providing traceability while maintaining data confidentiality through the encrypted nature of the actual data content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses cryptographic intermediaries such as zero-knowledge proofs and homomorphic encryption that allow verification of data usage properties without revealing the actual data content. These intermediaries enable traceability of data usage patterns and access control while preserving the confidentiality of the encrypted data itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If role-based access control is implemented, then data security and ownership are improved, but system complexity increases due to multiple encryption schemes and protocols

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata access securityVSAvoidencryption system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal cryptographic framework that handles multiple encryption schemes, authentication methods, and role-based access control through a single integrated protocol. The smart contract infrastructure provides multi-functional capabilities for data sharing, access control, permission management, and usage tracking within a unified system architecture, reducing operational complexity despite the underlying cryptographic diversity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12333045B2Distributed communication network
Publication Date: 2025.06.17 SOLVE CARE FOUNDATION OÜ
  • US12333045B2 patent drawing
  • US12333045B2 patent drawing
  • US12333045B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a distributed communication network comprising a plurality of computing nodes assigned to each participant of the network and a method of controlling access to data shared on said network. The computing node operates according to a set of pre-defined rules to control how a participant is able to behave on the network, that is, with whom they are able to communicate and on what basis, whilst at the same time giving the participant complete control over their data. The pre-defined rules are published to a blockchain ledger as a network protocol ledger to ensure it is immutable, traceable and easily distributed. In doing so, network protocol(s) not only specify the rules for the network but also enforces the rules on the participants to ensure it complies with the pre-defined behaviour.