Distributed Control Allocation for Reconfigurable Multi-Unit Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional control allocators for multi-unit vehicle combinations are tailored to specific configurations and require re-development when the configuration changes, lacking flexibility.

Innovation Solution

A distributed control allocation method involving a master control allocator and slave control allocators, dividing the control allocation into vehicle combination-specific and unit-specific levels, allowing the master control allocator to remain generic and adaptable to configuration changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a conventional control allocator is tailored to a specific vehicle combination configuration, then it can provide precise control for that configuration, but it requires re-development when the configuration changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidconfiguration adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control allocator is divided into a master control allocator that handles high-level control decisions and multiple slave control allocators that handle unit-specific control. This segmentation allows the master allocator to remain configuration-agnostic while slave allocators adapt to specific units, resolving the contradiction between precise control and configuration adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The master control allocator is designed with universal functionality to work with any vehicle combination configuration without re-development. It provides configuration-agnostic control allocation that can adapt to different numbers and types of vehicle units through standardized interfaces, eliminating the need for re-development while maintaining control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If the vehicle combination becomes over-actuated with more controllable degrees of freedom than desired forces and moments, then more precise control is possible, but the control problem becomes underdetermined with multiple possible solutions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control allocation problem is segmented into two levels: the master control allocator handles the underdetermined problem of distributing forces among vehicle units, while slave control allocators handle the actuator-level distribution within each unit. This segmentation reduces control complexity while maintaining precision by breaking down the large underdetermined system into smaller manageable sub-problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control architecture introduces a hierarchical dimension, separating control allocation into vehicle combination level (master allocator) and vehicle unit level (slave allocators). This dimensional separation transforms the complex underdetermined problem into a two-stage process, reducing overall control complexity while preserving the ability to utilize all available degrees of freedom for precise control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If a control allocator directly controls actuators in all vehicle units, then comprehensive control is achieved, but the system becomes complex and requires re-development for configuration changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into a master control allocator that communicates with vehicle units and slave control allocators that directly control actuators. This segmentation reduces system complexity by distributing control functions while maintaining reliable comprehensive control through standardized communication interfaces between master and slave allocators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Slave control allocators act as intermediaries between the master control allocator and the actuators. This intermediary layer simplifies the master allocator's task by handling actuator-specific details locally, reducing overall system complexity while ensuring reliable control through distributed intelligence at the actuator level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4536528B1Method of distributed control allocation for multi-unit vehicle combinations
Publication Date: 2026.03.25 VOLVO TRUCK CORP
  • EP4536528B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4536528B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4A
  • EP4536528B1 patent drawingFigure 4B

AI summary

A method (400) of distributed control allocation in a vehicle combination including multiple vehicle units (310-i) is provided, in which a master control allocator (420) solves a combination-specific control allocation problem to perform control allocation on a combination level, and each of a plurality of slave control allocators (430-i) receives unit-specific virtual control inputs (vi) from the master control allocator and then performs control allocation on vehicle unit level to control actuators (312-i) of an associated vehicle unit (310-i). A method performed in a master control allocator, a method performed in a slave control allocator, a distributed control allocation system, a master control allocator, a slave control allocator, a vehicle combination, a vehicle unit, and computer programs and computer program products are also provided.