Distributed Control System for Manufacturing Machines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling automated machinery in manufacturing environments, such as timing-based and analog sensor systems, are inefficient and prone to malfunctions due to their reliance on centralized control and limited precision, leading to potential delays and inefficiencies in operation sequencing.

Innovation Solution

A distributed control system where each machine is equipped with a control unit connected via a network switch, allowing direct communication and precise status monitoring using digital sensors, enabling machines to perform operations only when prerequisite conditions are met, thereby optimizing operation sequencing and reducing computational overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a centralized control center is used to receive signals from sensors and control individual machines, then the status of each machine can be determined and operations can be coordinated, but the system complexity increases and computational overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation coordination reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized control system is segmented into distributed control units, with each machine having its own control unit that can independently make control decisions. This segmentation reduces the complexity of the central control center while maintaining coordination reliability through peer-to-peer communication between control units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each control unit is equipped with digital sensors and processing capabilities to autonomously determine machine status and make control decisions without constant central intervention. This self-service approach reduces computational overhead at the central level while maintaining system-wide coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If timing-based control is used to perform operations at specific times, then operation sequencing can be simplified, but the system becomes prone to malfunctions when machines do not complete operations on time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation sequencing easeVSAvoidoperation completion reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Digital sensors provide real-time feedback on actual machine status and operation completion. This feedback is used by control units to adjust operation timing dynamically, ensuring that operations are performed only when prerequisite conditions are actually met, rather than relying on predetermined timing schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system transitions from static timing-based control to dynamic event-based control, where operation timing is continuously adjusted based on real-time machine status. This allows the system to adapt to variations in operation duration while maintaining precise sequencing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of information

If analog sensors are used to determine machine status, then real-time monitoring is possible, but measurement precision is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatus monitoring capabilityVSAvoidstatus detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Analog sensors are replaced with digital sensors that provide discrete, precise status information. This substitution eliminates the measurement precision limitations of analog systems while maintaining real-time monitoring capabilities through digital signal processing and communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If a central control center checks all signals continuously to determine operation status, then coordination can be maintained, but computational overhead and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation coordination reliabilityVSAvoidcomputational processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous signal checking function is segmented and distributed to individual control units. Each control unit monitors its own machine's status and communicates changes to other control units, eliminating the need for centralized continuous polling and reducing computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Control units autonomously monitor their own machine status using digital sensors and generate status signals without central intervention. This self-service monitoring reduces the computational burden on the central system while maintaining reliable coordination through distributed signal generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8818531B2Distributed control system
Publication Date: 2014.08.26 COMAU LLC
  • US8818531B2 patent drawing
  • US8818531B2 patent drawing
  • US8818531B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method for controlling a plurality of machines. The method includes identifying a first prerequisite operating condition for a first machine in the plurality of machines, the first machine having at least one control unit and configured to perform at least a first operation, obtaining at least one current operating condition corresponding to a second machine in the plurality of machines and if the at least one current operating condition meets the first prerequisite operating condition, performing the first operation.