Distributed Controller Interaction for Resilient Temperature Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems with multiple control devices under a central unit face disruptions when communication is lost, leading to ineffective control and potential system failures, such as temperature drops in pipeline heating systems.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a control arrangement where each control device shares operational and measurement information with adjacent devices in both upstream and downstream directions, allowing local reaction to system disruptions through a subsidiarity principle, ensuring continued system control even without central communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a central control unit is used to manage multiple control devices, then system coordination is improved, but communication disruptions cause loss of effective control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol effectivenessVSAvoidcommunication structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple independent control devices that each manage local segments of the system. Each control device can operate autonomously within its segment while maintaining coordination with adjacent devices through direct communication, eliminating the single point of failure at the central controller.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The communication structure transitions from a centralized radial topology to a distributed mesh topology where control devices communicate in multiple directions (upstream and downstream). This dimensional change in communication architecture provides redundant pathways and eliminates communication bottlenecks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Speed

If control devices communicate only with a central unit, then system-wide coordination is achieved, but local response to disruptions is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidlocal condition information
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

Each control device is equipped with local sensing and decision-making capabilities to detect and respond to disruptions in its immediate vicinity without waiting for central unit instructions. This local autonomy enables immediate response while maintaining overall system coordination through peer-to-peer communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Control devices continuously exchange operational status and environmental sensor data with adjacent devices, creating a distributed feedback network. This real-time information exchange enables each device to adapt its control actions based on local conditions and the state of neighboring segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach maintains system stability and control by enabling local adjustments to temperature setpoints among adjacent devices, preventing temperature drops and ensuring operational continuity even if central communication fails.

Implementation Method 1

a temperature sensor in contact with an object being heated by the length of heat tracing, the temperature sensor providing a feedback input to the thermostat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature sensing:

Implementation Method 2

a length of heat tracing line provided with electrical power through the thermostat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11953923B2Subsidiary interaction of controllers
Publication Date: 2024.04.09 BARKSDALE INC
  • US11953923B2 patent drawing
  • US11953923B2 patent drawing
  • US11953923B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control arrangement for an operating system has a plurality of control devices, arranged in a sequential order. Each control device shares information, including operational condition and a real-time measurement of at least one control parameter, with at least one control device in an upstream direction and at least one control device in a downstream direction. The control arrangement also has first and second terminal control devices. The first terminal control device is positioned at a beginning of the sequential order and the second terminal control device positioned at an end of the sequential order. The first terminal control device shares information only with control devices in the downstream direction and the second terminal control device shares information only with control devices in the upstream direction. In some applications, each control device that is not a terminal control device shares information with more than one control device in each direction.