Automated Cybersecurity Planning With Distributed Threat Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated planning systems struggle to scale effectively with large problem spaces, leading to inefficient and time-consuming search trees, and cybersecurity operations are overwhelmed by the volume and variety of cyber events, necessitating improved mitigation strategies.

Innovation Solution

An automated planning service deployed in a distributed architecture with asynchronous 'eventual agreement' consistency, utilizing machine learning and simulations to generate mitigation strategies for cybersecurity threats, employing master and worker nodes for efficient action assignment and result analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If current automated planning systems use domain-independent heuristics to handle large problem spaces, then they can attempt to deal with more objects, but they result in large search trees that cannot be processed in reasonable time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of objects in problem spaceVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large problem space into multiple sub-problems using a hierarchical decomposition approach. The automated planning system divides the overall task into smaller subtasks, each handled by separate planning processes. This segmentation reduces the size of search trees for each subproblem, enabling them to be processed in reasonable time while collectively solving the larger problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical dimension to the planning process, moving from flat, domain-independent heuristics to a multi-level hierarchical structure. This adds a temporal and organizational dimension to problem-solving, where high-level goals are decomposed into lower-level actions, allowing the system to handle large problem spaces without creating excessively large search trees at any single level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If human teams manually respond to cyber events, then they can analyze and respond to threats, but they cannot keep up with the volume, variety and variance of cyber events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat response effectivenessVSAvoidvolume of cyber events handled
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through automated planning algorithms that autonomously generate, select, and execute mitigation strategies without human intervention. The system automatically responds to cyber events by formulating plans, assigning tasks to appropriate agents, and executing responses, thereby maintaining reliable threat response while dramatically increasing productivity to handle the volume, variety, and variance of modern cyber events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical human response process with an automated planning and execution system. Instead of human analysts manually analyzing threats and responding, the system uses automated algorithms to detect, plan, and execute mitigation strategies, substituting human cognitive and manual processes with automated computational processes that can handle much higher volumes of events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a distributed architecture is used for automated planning service, then system scalability is improved, but synchronization overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem scalabilityVSAvoidsynchronization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining communication protocols, data formats, and coordination mechanisms before the distributed system operates. Task assignments, result submission formats, and node registration procedures are established in advance, reducing the need for complex runtime synchronization and allowing the system to scale efficiently while maintaining manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12537855B2Enhanced cybersecurity using an automated planning service
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 QOMPLX INC
  • US12537855B2 patent drawing
  • US12537855B2 patent drawing
  • US12537855B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and methods for enhanced cybersecurity using an automated planning service is provided, comprising an automated planning service that receives a network analysis job, constructs a simulation using known network and threat information, assigns individual actions to worker nodes for processing, analyzes the results and records new threat mitigation plans as they are produced to expedite future operations, and produces an action plan as output.