Distributed Autonomous Edge Management for HCI Scalability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Centralized management systems for edge computing systems in HCI environments consume excessive computing resources and time for managing a large number of nodes, leading to inefficiencies in task completion.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a distributed autonomous management system where edge nodes communicate with neighbors to perform management tasks, reducing the need for direct communication with a centralized management system, and utilizing a subset of nodes to synchronize configurations and health checks across the HCI system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a centralized management system is used to monitor and configure edge nodes, then management tasks can be performed, but computing resources are consumed excessively and management tasks take excessive time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanagement task completion speedVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized management system is segmented into distributed autonomous nodes. Each node independently performs management tasks for its local subset of edge devices, eliminating the single-point bottleneck. This segmentation distributes both the computational load and management responsibilities across multiple nodes, improving throughput and reducing resource consumption at any single point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a single-dimensional centralized architecture to a multi-dimensional distributed architecture. Management functions are distributed across spatial dimensions (multiple nodes) and functional dimensions (different nodes handling different task types). This dimensional expansion allows parallel processing of management tasks, significantly improving completion speed while distributing computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If a centralized management system communicates with each HCI node individually, then management tasks can be performed, but the number of communication interactions becomes excessively large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanagement task executionVSAvoidnumber of communication interactions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Autonomous nodes serve as intermediaries between the central management system and edge devices. Instead of the central system communicating directly with each edge node, it communicates with autonomous nodes that then coordinate with their respective edge devices. This intermediary layer reduces the number of direct communication interactions required while maintaining comprehensive management capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple management interactions are merged into single autonomous node operations. Each autonomous node aggregates management functions for its subset of edge devices, combining multiple individual communications into coordinated node-level communications. This merging reduces the total number of interactions between the central system and the distributed network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If centralized management is used for large numbers of edge computing systems, then comprehensive control is achieved, but the complexity of the management system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to manage large edge deploymentsVSAvoidmanagement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The management system is segmented into autonomous nodes, each handling a subset of edge devices. This segmentation reduces the complexity at each individual node while maintaining comprehensive system-wide management capability. Each node operates independently with simplified logic, yet collectively they provide robust control over large deployments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the organizational parameter from centralized-hierarchical to distributed-networked. This parameter change transforms the complexity structure, distributing management functions across multiple nodes with standardized interfaces. The result is reduced individual node complexity while maintaining or enhancing overall system adaptability to large-scale deployments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12411632B2Autonomous edge computing system management
Publication Date: 2025.09.09 DELL PROD LP
  • US12411632B2 patent drawing
  • US12411632B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information handling system cluster may include a plurality of nodes, each node including at least one processor and a memory. A particular node of the information handling system cluster may be configured to: receive management instructions from a central management system; cause the management instructions to be executed by other nodes of the information handling system cluster; receive result information from the other nodes; and transmit the result information to the central management system.