Distributed Energy Storage Layout for Reconfigurable Building Space

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing building infrastructure is rigid and inefficient, leading to high upfront capital costs, low utilization factors, and limited flexibility in reconfiguring space and function, with energy storage systems contributing to these issues.

Innovation Solution

A distributed and decoupled dynamic multifunction structure (DMS) with integrated energy storage devices, utilizing a feedforward control system to optimize energy distribution and consumption, reducing capital costs through strategic placement and decoupling energy pathways, and enabling reconfigurable assets to adapt to demand.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If energy storage systems are integrated into buildings to decouple power generation from power consumption, then energy efficiency is improved, but total building system cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidtotal building system cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The building is divided into multiple energy zones with distributed energy storage systems at different locations. Each zone can independently manage its energy production and consumption, allowing for localized optimization without requiring a single large-scale energy storage system throughout the entire building.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The energy storage systems are designed to perform multiple functions including peak load shifting, renewable energy integration, backup power supply, and demand response participation. This multi-functionality justifies the investment by providing numerous benefits beyond simple energy storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If infrastructure is designed to meet worst-case scenarios, then reliability is improved, but utilization factor decreases and capital costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidutilization factor
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The infrastructure is designed with dynamic capabilities that allow it to adapt to varying demand conditions. Energy storage systems can be charged during low-demand periods and discharged during peak periods, enabling the system to maintain reliability without requiring constant operation at maximum capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Energy storage systems are charged in advance during off-peak hours when demand is low, preparing energy reserves before peak demand occurs. This preliminary action ensures reliability during high-demand periods without requiring the infrastructure to operate at maximum capacity continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If buildings are designed with rigid infrastructure, then structural stability is improved, but flexibility to reconfigure space and function decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidflexibility to reconfigure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The building infrastructure is segmented into modular components that can be independently configured and repositioned. This modular approach maintains overall structural stability while allowing flexible reconfiguration of internal spaces and systems to adapt to changing functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250343421A1Feedforward Dynamic Multifunctional Structure with Distributed Energy Storage System
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 GURIN MICHAEL
  • US20250343421A1 patent drawing
  • US20250343421A1 patent drawing
  • US20250343421A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for reconfiguring physical space having structural integrity, notably empowered by leveraging energy distribution that further leverages dynamic feedforward allocation of distributed energy storage, to maximize space utilization factor to accelerate return on investment, reduce system energy consumption, and maximize functional utilization of physical space particularly suited for modular construction with integral and approximately continuous updating of digital twin modeling to empower higher precision feedforward and feedback systems control resulting in high-performance buildings.