Distributed Farming System with Centralized Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional farms face challenges in providing fresh produce efficiently due to distribution issues, pricing variability, and inconsistency caused by geographic and meteorological constraints.

Innovation Solution

A distributed farming system that utilizes networked miniature farms, where produce is grown to approximately 75% completion at a centralized hub and then transferred to remote, on-site mini-farms for final growth and harvesting, facilitated by a computer-implemented method involving data analysis and adjustment of growing parameters via a centralized server.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional farms grow produce from seed to harvest at a single location, then the produce can be grown in natural conditions, but distribution issues and geographic constraints reduce efficiency and increase costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefarm productivityVSAvoidgeographic and meteorological constraints
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The farming system is segmented into multiple distributed mini-farms located in different geographic regions, each capable of independently growing produce. This segmentation allows the farming operation to bypass geographic and meteorological constraints by distributing risk and production across multiple locations, thereby improving overall productivity and reducing the impact of local adverse conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional two-dimensional ground-based farming to three-dimensional vertical farming structures. By utilizing vertical space through stacked growing layers and vertical towers, the system dramatically increases production capacity per unit of land area, directly addressing productivity limitations while remaining independent of external geographic constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If produce is grown in centralized traditional farms, then large-scale production is achieved, but distribution distances increase costs and reduce freshness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction scaleVSAvoiddistribution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized farm is divided into multiple distributed mini-farms that are strategically located closer to consumer markets. Each mini-farm operates semi-independently, producing smaller batches of produce that can be distributed over shorter distances. This segmentation maintains total production capacity while dramatically reducing distribution time and improving freshness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A centralized server acts as an intermediary, coordinating growth parameters and monitoring produce development across all mini-farms. This digital intermediary enables synchronized production timing and standardized quality control, allowing distributed farms to achieve economies of scale similar to centralized operations while maintaining the freshness advantages of local production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If remote mini-farms operate independently with local control, then on-site harvesting is enabled, but consistency in growing parameters becomes difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveon-site harvesting capabilityVSAvoidgrowing parameter consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors in each mini-farm continuously monitor growing parameters such as temperature, humidity, light intensity, and nutrient levels. This data is transmitted to the centralized server, which compares actual readings against target parameters and automatically sends adjustment commands back to the mini-farms. This closed-loop feedback system ensures consistent growing conditions across all distributed locations while maintaining the ease of on-site operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The mini-farms are equipped with automated environmental control systems that can self-adjust growing parameters based on sensor feedback and server instructions. This self-service capability allows each remote location to maintain precise growing conditions independently, ensuring consistency without requiring constant manual intervention, thereby preserving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If vertical farming structures are implemented to increase space utilization, then productivity per land area increases, but device complexity and initial cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction per unit spaceVSAvoidfarming system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vertical mini-farm modules are designed as universal, multi-functional units that can be deployed in various settings and scaled to different sizes. Each module integrates multiple functions (growth chambers, lighting, irrigation, monitoring) into standardized components that can be replicated and combined. This universality reduces overall system complexity by using standardized parts rather than custom-designed components, while still achieving high productivity per unit space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11522946B2Distributed farming system and components thereof
Publication Date: 2022.12.06 SMALLHOLD INC
  • US11522946B2 patent drawing
  • US11522946B2 patent drawing
  • US11522946B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatus, systems and processor-readable storage media for distributed farming are provided herein. A computer-implemented method includes facilitating transfer of one or more substrates and one or more crops at approximately a given stage of a growth cycle, from (i) a first location to (ii) one or more growing units, wherein the given stage of the growth cycle comprises a stage prior to completion of the growth cycle; processing data, captured via multiple sensors within the one or more growing units, wherein the data comprise (i) data pertaining to at least one of the one or more substrates and the one or more crops, and (ii) data pertaining to the one or more growing units; and performing one or more automated actions based at least in part on the processing of the data.