Distributed Flap Actuation for Non-Responsive Component Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In aircraft actuation systems, when motors operating control surfaces at transonic speeds turn at different rates due to non-responsive components, it leads to flap skew, necessitating the disabling of entire flap systems to prevent damage, resulting in increased approach speeds and potential diversions.

Innovation Solution

A distributed aircraft actuation system with an actuator system manager that monitors control surfaces, detects non-responsive components, and deactivates affected sets while keeping others active, reducing undesired aerodynamic effects and maintaining system functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the entire flap system is disabled to prevent damage from non-responsive components, then aircraft safety is improved, but approach speeds increase and diversions may be required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft safetyVSAvoidapproach speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the flap system into independent controllable segments (first set of control surfaces and second set of control surfaces). When a non-responsive component is detected in one segment, only that specific segment is deactivated while other segments remain operational. This segmentation allows partial system operation rather than complete shutdown, maintaining lower approach speeds while ensuring safety by isolating the problematic component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If motors are monitored and affected sets are selectively deactivated, then system functionality is maintained, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the actuator system manager continuously monitors motor performance and control surface responsiveness. When a non-responsive component is detected through this feedback loop, the system automatically deactivates only the affected set of control surfaces. This feedback-based approach maintains system functionality through intelligent monitoring while managing complexity by focusing surveillance only on critical operational parameters rather than comprehensive system oversight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Strength

If complete flap system disablement is used to prevent damage, then component protection is improved, but aerodynamic performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent protectionVSAvoidaerodynamic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates the problematic non-responsive component or set of control surfaces from the overall flap system. By deactivating only the affected set while keeping other sets operational, the system removes the harmful element (non-responsive component causing potential damage) while preserving the functional aerodynamic surfaces. This selective extraction protects components from damage while maintaining optimal aerodynamic performance by keeping working flaps active.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11591070B2Methods and apparatus for a distributed aircraft actuation system
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 THE BOEING CO
  • US11591070B2 patent drawing
  • US11591070B2 patent drawing
  • US11591070B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatus, and articles of manufacture for a distributed aircraft actuation system are disclosed. An example apparatus includes a non-responsive component detector to determine a position difference between a first position of a first control surface of an aircraft and a second position of a second control surface of the aircraft, the first position lagging the second position, and a command generator, in response to determining that the position difference satisfies a threshold, the command generator is to cease movement of the second control surface at the second position, attempt to move the first control surface to the second position, and cease movement of the first control surface when moved to the second position.