Distributed Flight Control System Modular Architecture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current flight control systems in aircraft are cumbersome due to the need for numerous cables, which increase weight and vulnerability to electromagnetic disturbances, and they require multiple computers that complicate the architecture and reduce safety.

Innovation Solution

A distributed flight control system with a modular architecture featuring primary and secondary control systems, each with independent energy sources and networks, reducing the number of computers while maintaining safety through redundant modules and distinct communication protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a centralized flight control system with multiple computers is used to ensure safety through redundancy, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases and weight increases due to numerous cables

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidarchitecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flight control system is divided into multiple independent elementary systems (System 1, System 2, System 3, and BCM), each capable of autonomous operation. This segmentation allows redundancy without requiring a single complex centralized architecture, as each system can independently control the aircraft if others fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each elementary system is designed with universal functionality to perform both primary control and backup functions. The systems can operate in different modes (nominal, standby, backup) and any system can take over control functions, eliminating the need for specialized dedicated backup systems and reducing overall architectural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If numerous cables are deployed to connect computers to actuators and control surfaces, then control functionality is maintained, but weight increases and exposure to electromagnetic disturbances increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol functionalityVSAvoidsystem weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Each elementary system has its own dedicated set of cables connecting to actuators and control surfaces. This segmentation means that cable sets are distributed across multiple independent systems rather than consolidated in a single centralized system, reducing the total cable length and weight while maintaining full control functionality through redundant paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If numerous cables are deployed to connect computers to actuators and control surfaces, then control functionality is maintained, but exposure to electromagnetic disturbances increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol functionalityVSAvoidelectromagnetic disturbances
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cable infrastructure is segmented into multiple independent sets, each associated with a specific elementary system. This segmentation reduces the total cable length within each system and creates electrical isolation between systems, thereby reducing cumulative electromagnetic interference and vulnerability to disturbances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If multiple independent elementary systems are used to ensure safety, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidnumber of computers
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple elementary systems are merged into a unified flight control architecture where they share common control surfaces and actuators. This merging allows the systems to function as a coordinated ensemble rather than isolated units, reducing overall complexity while maintaining the reliability benefits of redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Each elementary system is designed with universal control capabilities, allowing any system to perform any control function. This multi-functionality reduces the need for specialized dedicated systems and simplifies the overall architecture by eliminating redundant specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9081372B2Distributed flight control system implemented according to an integrated modular avionics architecture
Publication Date: 2015.07.14 AIRBUS OPERATIONS (SAS)
  • US9081372B2 patent drawing
  • US9081372B2 patent drawing
  • US9081372B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flight control system for an aircraft, intended for controlling a plurality of actuators adapted for actuating control surfaces of the aircraft from information supplied by piloting members and/or sensors of the aircraft. The system includes a primary control system adapted for controlling a first set of control surface actuators and a secondary control system adapted for controlling a second set of control surface actuators, the primary and secondary systems being respectively powered by independent energy sources of different types.