Distributed Flight Control Using Physical Redundancy for Failure Tolerance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated flight control systems face challenges in implementing redundancy without increasing complexity or cost, which is critical for ensuring safety against failures.

Innovation Solution

A distributed flight control system is implemented, where each actuator is controlled by a separate processor, and the system utilizes the physical redundancy of the aircraft to provide redundancy in flight control, allowing for continued safe operation even if one processor or actuator fails.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional redundant flight control systems are implemented, then safety and reliability are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight control safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flight control system is segmented into multiple independent flight control computers, each capable of independently controlling the aircraft. This segmentation allows redundancy without requiring a centralized complex redundant system, as each computer operates autonomously with its own sensors and actuators, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each flight control computer is designed as a universal, multi-functional unit that can perform all flight control functions independently. This universality means that any single computer can take over completely if others fail, providing redundancy without needing specialized backup systems, thus improving reliability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If traditional redundant flight control systems are implemented, then safety and reliability are improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight control safetyVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the flight control system into separate, independent computers rather than building complex redundancy into a single system, the patent enables modular manufacturing. Each flight control computer can be produced independently using standardized components and processes, reducing overall manufacturing cost while maintaining safety through redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses identical copies of flight control computers rather than complex unique redundant systems. Each computer is a complete functional copy capable of independent operation, providing redundancy through replication rather than through complex design, thereby reducing cost while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If physical redundancy is utilized, then safe operation during failure is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure toleranceVSAvoidredundancy implementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft is divided into multiple independent flight control modules, each with its own processors and actuators. This segmentation allows physical redundancy to be implemented in a modular fashion where failure of one module does not affect others, improving failure tolerance while keeping each module simple and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each flight control computer is designed with local quality - it has its own dedicated sensors, processors, and actuators that are physically separated and independent. This localization of control functions allows redundancy without requiring complex interconnections between systems, as each unit operates autonomously with its own local resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250147513A1Distributed flight control system
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 KITTY HAWK CORP
  • US20250147513A1 patent drawing
  • US20250147513A1 patent drawing
  • US20250147513A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A set of commands for each of a plurality of actuators to alter an aircraft's state responsive to one or more inputs is produced. The set of commands is provided to fewer than all actuators comprising the plurality of actuators.