Distributed Graph Clustering With Atomic Transactions at Scale

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Analyzing large graphs poses challenges due to high computing costs, time constraints, and data storage requirements, particularly in distributed computing environments with billions of nodes or trillions of edges.

Innovation Solution

Implementing distributed graph analysis using atomic transactions across multiple computing devices, utilizing remote direct memory access and ACID-compliant operations to ensure data consistency and prevent conflicts, with parallel processing and duplicate data structures to enhance efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If distributed processing is used to analyze large graphs, then productivity is improved, but data consistency and conflict prevention become problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraph analysis throughputVSAvoiddata consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the graph data into multiple partitions distributed across different computing devices. Each partition is independently processed by worker processes, enabling parallel computation while maintaining data consistency through controlled access boundaries. The graph data structure is segmented into manageable chunks that can be processed concurrently without interfering with each other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary data structure layer that mediates between multiple worker processes and the underlying storage system. This intermediary layer provides atomic read-modify-write operations that ensure data consistency across distributed workers, acting as a buffer that reconciles concurrent access conflicts without requiring complex inter-worker communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If parallel processing is implemented across multiple computing devices, then processing speed is improved, but latency increases due to coordination overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where each worker process independently manages its own operations using atomic read-modify-write primitives. Workers do not require explicit coordination or communication with each other, eliminating coordination overhead and reducing latency. Each worker autonomously processes its assigned partition and commits changes independently to the distributed data structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If large graphs are stored in distributed memory systems, then storage capacity is improved, but computing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidcomputing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large graph data into distributed partitions stored across multiple computing devices. This segmentation enables efficient localized processing where workers only access and process their assigned partitions, reducing the computational overhead of managing monolithic large-scale graphs and lowering overall computing costs through parallelized operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12517894B1Distributed graph analysis with atomic transactions
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12517894B1 patent drawing
  • US12517894B1 patent drawing
  • US12517894B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method can include a plurality of iterations. An iteration can include performing, by a computing system comprising one or more computing devices, for each node of a plurality of nodes of a first graph, one or more atomic transactions. An atomic transaction can include retrieving, from one or more distributed data structures that are distributed over a plurality of computing devices, neighbor data indicative of one or more neighbor nodes connected to the node by one or more edges. An atomic transaction can include retrieving, from the one or more distributed data structures based on the neighbor data, cluster data associated with the one or more neighbor nodes. An atomic transaction can include writing, to the one or more distributed data structures based on the neighbor data and the cluster data, cluster assignment data assigning the node to one or more clusters of a plurality of clusters.