Real-Time Voltage Regulation via Distributed Inverter Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power distribution networks face challenges in managing distributed energy resources, particularly in preventing network overload, redistributing power, and ensuring voltage regulation, as traditional control strategies fail to guarantee system-level optimality and stability, especially with fast-changing load conditions.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of distributed control techniques that leverage fast feedback from power-electronics-interfaced devices to continuously drive inverter output powers towards AC optimal power flow (OPF) targets, using linear approximations of AC power-flow equations and double-smoothing techniques, allowing for real-time voltage regulation without requiring knowledge of all loads and network points.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional control strategies are used for managing distributed energy resources, then device complexity is reduced, but system-level optimality and stability cannot be guaranteed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem-level optimality and stabilityVSAvoidcontrol strategy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the distribution network into multiple zones with designated master nodes, where each master node independently manages its local zone. This segmentation allows distributed control without requiring centralized coordination, achieving system-level optimality through local decision-making while maintaining stability through coordinated voltage regulation across zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where master nodes continuously monitor voltage measurements from slave nodes and adjust inverter output powers accordingly. The feedback loop uses voltage-constraint coefficients to drive the system toward optimal power flow targets, ensuring both optimality and stability through real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If real-time voltage regulation is implemented using distributed control techniques, then voltage regulation precision is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage regulation precisionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent assigns different roles (master or slave) to nodes based on their local characteristics and capabilities. Master nodes perform computationally intensive tasks of determining voltage-constraint coefficients and power setpoints, while slave nodes simply report measurements and receive control commands. This local differentiation achieves precise voltage regulation without requiring all nodes to perform complex computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses linear approximations of AC power-flow equations to obtain sufficiently accurate solutions without performing full nonlinear optimization. This partial action approach achieves acceptable voltage regulation precision while significantly reducing computational complexity, allowing real-time control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If fast feedback from power-electronics-interfaced devices is used to drive inverter output powers towards OPF targets, then productivity is improved, but loss of information increases due to linear approximations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time control speedVSAvoidaccuracy of power-flow equations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control where voltage-constraint coefficients are continuously updated based on current voltage measurements and previous coefficient values. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt to changing load conditions in real-time, maintaining productivity while compensating for the limitations of linear approximations through continuous refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuous control action by using double-smoothing techniques and iterative updates of voltage-constraint coefficients. The system continuously drives inverter output powers toward optimal power flow targets without interruption, maintaining productivity while gradually reducing the impact of linear approximation errors through persistent refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Ease of operation

If distributed control is implemented without knowledge of all loads and network points, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision may be insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidvoltage measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables master nodes to determine voltage-constraint coefficients and power setpoints using only local voltage measurements from slave nodes within their zones. Each zone is self-sufficient, requiring no information about loads or network conditions in other zones. This self-service approach greatly simplifies operation while maintaining adequate measurement precision through local feedback control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10148092B2Real time voltage regulation through gather and broadcast techniques
Publication Date: 2018.12.04 ALLIANCE FOR ENERGY INNOVATION LLC
  • US10148092B2 patent drawing
  • US10148092B2 patent drawing
  • US10148092B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example device includes a processor configured to receive a plurality of voltage measurements corresponding to nodes in a distribution network, and determine, for each respective node: a value of a first coefficient, based on a previous value of the first coefficient, a minimum voltage value for the node, and a voltage measurement that corresponds to the node, and a value of a second coefficient based on a previous value of the second coefficient, a maximum voltage value for the node, and the voltage measurement. The processor of the example device is also configured to cause an inverter-interfaced energy resource connected to the distribution network to modify its output power based on the value of the first coefficient for each node and the value of the second coefficient for each node.