Distributed Job Execution Using Database Job Claiming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional distributed job execution systems without a central scheduler face challenges in ensuring non-overlapping data processing and preventing duplication, leading to wastage of computational resources.

Innovation Solution

A distributed job execution system that generates and stores job data records with status updates, allowing each container to act as a scheduler, ensuring non-overlapping processing by updating job status before execution and synchronizing with a database to avoid duplication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a central scheduler is used to manage distributed job execution, then job scheduling and status tracking are centralized and controlled, but the system becomes a single point of failure and consumes considerable resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejob execution reliabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the scheduling functionality from a centralized scheduler and distributes it to individual containers. Each container maintains its own job data records and execution state, eliminating the single point of failure while preserving job management capabilities through local autonomy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the centralized scheduling function into distributed components where each container independently manages its own job execution. Job data records are partitioned across containers, with each container handling specific jobs without requiring a central coordinating authority

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If a central scheduler is removed from distributed job execution, then system complexity and resource consumption are reduced, but the system cannot ensure non-overlapping data processing and may duplicate job processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem architecture complexityVSAvoidjob processing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where containers continuously update job data records with their execution state (e.g., claiming jobs, processing status, completion). This feedback loop ensures that other containers can see the current state of jobs and avoid duplicating processing, maintaining precision without centralized control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Containers perform preliminary actions by claiming jobs and updating job data records before actual processing begins. This preliminary claim mechanism ensures that once a container takes a job, it is marked as processed, preventing other containers from duplicating the same job processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If job status is not tracked before execution in a distributed system, then containers can access jobs freely, but duplicate processing occurs and computational resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejob access easeVSAvoidcomputational resource waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent requires containers to perform preliminary status updates and job claiming actions before executing job processing. By updating job data records to reflect claimed or in-progress status before actual processing, the system prevents duplicate execution while maintaining easy job access through the distributed database

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260099364A1Facilitating distributed job execution
Publication Date: 2026.04.09 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20260099364A1 patent drawing
  • US20260099364A1 patent drawing
  • US20260099364A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are described herein for facilitating distributed job execution without a central job scheduler. The system may cause a container to, prior to executing job execution code for a job associated with a job data record, update a record instance of the job data record to indicate an updated status for the job and attempt to update the job data record at a database based on the record instance of the job data record. If the container successfully updates the job data record, the container may execute the job execution code for the job. If the container fails to update the job data record, the container may refrain from executing the job execution code for the job. The system may then update a first job data record associated with a first job at the database based on execution of the first job by a first container.