Distributed Learning Update Selection via Accumulated Error

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current distributed learning methods in machine learning systems suffer from excessive computational overhead due to redundant uplink messages and inefficient client node selection, particularly in scenarios where channel conditions and local resources are not considered, leading to suboptimal performance and increased energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

Client nodes determine the importance of their updates based on accumulated error between epochs of training, using local data and channel conditions to decide whether to send updates to the server node, thereby reducing unnecessary uploads and optimizing network resource utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If client nodes send updated parameters at every iteration, then model training convergence is improved, but computational overhead and network traffic increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel training convergenceVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Client nodes perform preliminary local training for multiple epochs before determining whether to send updates. They accumulate error metrics during these preliminary epochs to assess the significance of their updates, thereby avoiding unnecessary transmissions while ensuring model convergence is maintained through selective, high-quality updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where client nodes monitor the accumulated error between model parameters across epochs and use this information to determine upload eligibility. This feedback loop enables intelligent decision-making about when to transmit updates, balancing convergence requirements with computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If predefined schedules are used to select client nodes for updates, then training process is simplified, but network resource utilization becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining process simplicityVSAvoidnetwork resource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static predefined schedules to dynamic selection mechanisms. Client nodes dynamically determine their upload eligibility based on real-time accumulated error metrics and local training conditions, allowing the system to adapt to varying network conditions and optimize resource utilization without sacrificing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the selection parameter from arbitrary schedule-based indexing to error-metric-based decision-making. By monitoring and comparing accumulated error values against thresholds, the system intelligently selects which client nodes should transmit, optimizing network resource allocation based on actual training needs rather than fixed timing patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If all client nodes transmit updates every epoch, then training accuracy is maximized, but energy consumption and network congestion increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring all client nodes to transmit every epoch, the system applies partial action by selecting only those nodes whose accumulated error exceeds thresholds. This partial transmission approach maintains sufficient training accuracy by focusing resources on nodes with significant updates, while avoiding the excessive energy consumption and network congestion associated with universal transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250300901A1Distributed learning processes
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US20250300901A1 patent drawing
  • US20250300901A1 patent drawing
  • US20250300901A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method performed by a first client node in a communications network. The first client node acts as a worker in a distributed machine learning process for training a model. The training is co-ordinated by a server node that acts as a master in the distributed machine learning process. The method includes: performing a first epoch of training on a first local copy of the model to obtain a first update to the model; performing a second epoch of training on a second local copy of the model to obtain a second update to the model; determining an accumulated error associated with differences between values of one or more parameters of the model between the first epoch and the second epoch of training; and using the accumulated error to determine whether to send the second update to the model to the server node.