Distributed Ledger Cross-Border Payment Settlement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cross-border payment systems are slow, expensive, and risky due to reliance on correspondent banking, messaging networks, and clearing intermediaries, leading to delayed transactions, high reconciliation costs, and counterparty risks.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a distributed ledger system for network payments that allows payment originators and beneficiaries to post and validate transactions on a peer-to-peer network, enabling real-time settlement and reducing reliance on intermediaries through cryptography and digital signatures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If correspondent banking and clearing intermediaries are used for cross-border payments, then transaction security and validation are improved, but transaction speed and settlement time deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidtransaction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the intermediary clearing houses and correspondent banking layers from the payment flow. By using a distributed ledger where banks post and validate transactions directly peer-to-peer, the system removes the speed-limiting intermediaries while maintaining security through cryptographic validation and consensus mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The distributed ledger itself acts as a new intermediary that enables direct peer-to-peer transactions between banks. This mediator provides the security and validation functions previously performed by clearing houses, but does so in real-time without the delays of traditional correspondent banking networks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple clearing intermediaries and messaging networks are involved, then transaction validation and security are improved, but transaction cost and reconciliation expenses worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction validationVSAvoidreconciliation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the validation, security, and reconciliation functions into a single distributed ledger system. All participating banks validate transactions collectively through consensus mechanisms, eliminating the need for separate reconciliation processes and reducing duplicative validation efforts across multiple intermediaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The distributed ledger provides real-time feedback to all participants about transaction status and ledger state. This immediate feedback eliminates the need for periodic reconciliation and allows banks to verify transactions as they occur, reducing the computational and operational resources needed for post-processing reconciliation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If traditional correspondent banking networks are used, then payment tracking and transparency are improved, but settlement time and fund availability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment trackingVSAvoidsettlement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The distributed ledger enables continuous real-time tracking and settlement of payments without interruption or delay. Transactions are posted, validated, and settled in a continuous stream on the peer-to-peer network, eliminating the batch processing and waiting periods inherent in traditional correspondent banking systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical, multi-step messaging and clearing process with a cryptographic system based on digital signatures and consensus validation. This substitution enables instantaneous settlement and tracking while maintaining complete transparency through the shared distributed ledger visible to all participants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If centralized clearing houses and trusted third parties are used, then transaction security and agreement on ledger state are improved, but system complexity and intermediary dependencies worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveagreement on ledger stateVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the centralized clearing house function into distributed nodes across multiple participating banks. Each bank operates its own node on the peer-to-peer network, validating transactions independently through cryptographic proof rather than relying on a single centralized authority. This segmentation reduces dependency on complex intermediary structures while maintaining security through distributed consensus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11037142B2Systems and methods for the application of distributed ledgers for network payments as financial exchange settlement and reconciliation
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US11037142B2 patent drawing
  • US11037142B2 patent drawing
  • US11037142B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for the application of distributed ledgers for network payments as financial exchange settlement and reconciliation are disclosed. In one embodiment, a method for processing network payments using a distributed ledger may include: (1) a payment originator initiating a payment instruction to a payment beneficiary; (2) a payment originator bank posting and committing the payment instruction to a distributed ledger on a peer-to-peer network; (3) the payment beneficiary bank posting and committing the payment instruction to the distributed ledger on a peer-to-peer network; and (4) the payment originator bank validating and processing the payment through a payment originator bank internal system and debiting an originator account.