Distributed Lighting Control Satellite Units

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Centralized lighting control systems are limited by their reliance on high-voltage wiring, require extensive conduit and costly copper conductors, and lack scalability and redundancy, making them inefficient and difficult to manage, especially in cases of controller failure or emergency overrides.

Innovation Solution

A distributed lighting control system with satellite control units and low-voltage DC power distribution, allowing for independent control of light fixtures, reduced high-voltage infrastructure needs, and communication with a central controller for centralized management and energy monitoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a centralized lighting control system is used, then all lighting devices can be controlled from one location and energy costs are reduced, but the system lacks reliability and scalability, and requires extensive high-voltage wiring with costly copper conductors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized control capabilityVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the centralized control architecture into distributed satellite control units, each managing a specific zone or group of fixtures. This segmentation provides redundancy - if one satellite fails, others continue operating independently - while maintaining centralized management capabilities through communication between satellites and the central controller.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If a centralized lighting control system is used, then all lighting devices can be controlled from one location, but extensive high-voltage wiring and costly copper conductors are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized control capabilityVSAvoidwiring infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces high-voltage AC wiring infrastructure with low-voltage DC power distribution through satellite control units. Each satellite converts AC to DC locally and distributes power at low voltage to connected fixtures, eliminating the need for extensive high-voltage conduit and large copper conductors while maintaining control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of energy

If a centralized lighting control system is used, then energy costs are reduced through automated control, but the system lacks adaptability and is difficult to scale

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy cost reductionVSAvoidsystem scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables dynamic scaling by allowing satellite control units to be added, removed, or reconfigured independently based on occupancy needs and spatial requirements. Each satellite can autonomously manage its connected fixtures, enabling the system to adapt to changing building configurations without requiring complete system redesign or extensive rewiring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Extent of automation

If a centralized lighting control system is used, then automated lighting control is achieved, but the system lacks redundancy and becomes non-operational if the controller fails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated lighting controlVSAvoidredundancy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates redundancy by distributing control functions across multiple independent satellite control units. Each satellite maintains automated control capabilities locally, so if the central controller or any single satellite fails, other satellites continue operating their assigned zones, providing a cushion against system-wide failure and maintaining lighting automation throughout the building.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables cost-effective, scalable, and resilient lighting control with reduced installation complexity, improved energy management, and the ability to respond to emergencies without relying on a single central controller, while maintaining efficient energy usage and adaptability to changing occupancy needs.

Implementation Method 1

Each satellite control unit includes an AC to DC converter and a power meter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAC to DC conversion:

Data Source

PatentUS9078305B2Distributed lighting control that includes satellite control units
Publication Date: 2015.07.07 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC
  • US9078305B2 patent drawing
  • US9078305B2 patent drawing
  • US9078305B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods and apparatuses of lighting control are disclosed. At least one lighting control system includes a central controller, a plurality of M satellite control units, a plurality of N light fixtures, and a central controller. Each satellite control unit includes an AC to DC converter and a power meter. The plurality of N light fixtures are connected to a one of the plurality of M satellite control units through N power control devices. Further, the central controller is operative to communicate with one or more of the plurality M satellite control units and one or more of the plurality of N light fixtures.