Distributed ML for Base Station Thermal Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for managing operational temperature conditions in radio base stations are inefficient and insecure, particularly in distributed communication systems, as they rely on reactive approaches and require significant computational resources and data sharing, which is costly and poses privacy concerns.

Innovation Solution

A method using distributed machine learning (ML) with secure aggregation, where a central ML model is trained for clusters of local computing devices, allowing for optimized operational temperature control without sharing sensitive data, thereby enhancing energy efficiency and reducing computational and data transport costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If independent ML models are trained separately for every radio base station, then the model can capture base station specific characteristics, but a lot of compute power is required and scaling becomes computationally expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidcompute power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the ML modeling task by training separate local ML models at each base station while using a centralized server for coordination. This allows each base station to maintain its own optimized model without requiring the entire network to train independent models simultaneously, reducing overall compute power requirements while maintaining base station specific accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A centralized server acts as an intermediary between base stations and the ML training process. The server coordinates model training, manages data collection from multiple base stations, and distributes updated models back to base stations. This intermediary approach enables efficient resource sharing and reduces redundant computations across the network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Use of energy by moving object

If a centralized ML model is used to capture all training details, then computational resources are reduced, but data security and privacy concerns arise as different radio base stations operated by different operators would not prefer to share sensitive operational data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompute power consumptionVSAvoiddata privacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments data processing by training local ML models at each base station using locally stored operational data. Only the trained model parameters (weights) are shared with the centralized server, not the sensitive operational data itself. This segmentation preserves data privacy while enabling centralized coordination and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized server serves as an intermediary that receives and processes only aggregated model parameters from base stations rather than raw operational data. This intermediary approach allows the server to coordinate training across operators without accessing or storing sensitive data, maintaining security and privacy while enabling resource sharing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If reactive climate system control is used, then the system is simple to implement, but it is inefficient compared to predictive control that considers multiple affecting factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidtemperature management efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by using ML models to predict future temperature conditions and climate system needs before they actually occur. The models process multiple affecting factors (environmental parameters, base station state, hardware configuration) to forecast temperature trends, allowing the climate system to be adjusted proactively rather than reactively, improving efficiency while maintaining manageable complexity through automated prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240406776A1Method and system for managing operational temperature of base station
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US20240406776A1 patent drawing
  • US20240406776A1 patent drawing
  • US20240406776A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for managing operational temperature conditions of one or more base stations being executed at a central computing device in a communication system is provided. The method includes acquiring initial operational parameters for each local computing device of a first group of local computing devices associated with the one or more base stations. The method further includes determining one or more clusters by grouping each local computing device of the first group of local computing devices under one of the determined clusters based on the acquired operational parameters. The method further includes training, a central machine learning (ML) model for each determined cluster. The method further includes acquiring, for each local computing device of a second group of local computing devices associated with the one or more base stations, updated operational parameters. The method further includes computing an operational difference measure of the second group of local computing devices using the acquired updated operational parameters. The method further includes determining optimized operational temperature conditions to be transmitted to the second group of local computing devices by using distributed ML, in response to determining that the computed operational difference measure is less than a threshold value.