Distributed Performance Evaluation Framework for Network Services

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Developers face challenges in simulating and testing the availability, reliability, and scalability of network-based services, especially for large-scale services, due to the complexity and cost of replicating production network traffic, which can lead to systems not scaling as expected under actual load.

Innovation Solution

A distributed performance evaluation framework is introduced, comprising a control and reporting tier and a load-generating tier, which allows for scalable testing by generating network traffic on-demand using virtual machine instances, enabling cost-effective stress testing of network-based services regardless of the protocols used.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If production network traffic is simulated to test service performance, then availability and reliability can be evaluated, but the complexity and cost of replicating production network traffic increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice availabilityVSAvoidtesting infrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates simplified copies of production network traffic patterns using synthetic data generators that replicate the statistical characteristics and protocols of real traffic without requiring actual production data. This allows reliability testing while avoiding the complexity of capturing and replaying real network traffic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The testing framework is designed to be protocol-agnostic and can handle multiple types of network services simultaneously. The synthetic traffic generators can adapt to different service types (web, API, streaming, etc.) using the same underlying infrastructure, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If production network traffic is simulated to test service performance, then availability and reliability can be evaluated, but the cost of replicating production network traffic increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice availabilityVSAvoidtesting infrastructure cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs ephemeral test data and synthetic traffic patterns that can be generated on-demand and discarded after testing. Instead of maintaining expensive production traffic recordings, the system creates lightweight synthetic datasets that fulfill the same testing purpose at minimal cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The synthetic traffic generators allow dynamic adjustment of traffic parameters (volume, patterns, protocols) to match different service requirements without changing the underlying infrastructure. This flexibility reduces the need for multiple specialized testing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If large-scale network-based services are tested with high volumes of requests, then scalability can be evaluated, but the complexity and cost of simulating such high volumes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverequest handling capacityVSAvoidtesting infrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the testing infrastructure into modular components: synthetic data generators, traffic simulators, service proxies, and analysis modules. Each component can be independently scaled and configured, allowing high-volume testing without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The service proxy acts as an intermediary between the synthetic traffic generators and the actual network service. It handles the complexity of protocol translation, traffic shaping, and request routing, allowing the testing system to generate high volumes of requests while the proxy manages the complexity of delivering them appropriately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If actual production traffic is used for testing, then realistic performance evaluation is achieved, but the cost and complexity of infrastructure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance evaluation accuracyVSAvoidtesting infrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates synthetic copies of production traffic that preserve the statistical properties, protocol distributions, and temporal patterns of real traffic. These synthetic replicas provide sufficient measurement precision for performance evaluation without requiring actual production traffic capture and replay infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9455887B1Distributed performance evaluation framework
Publication Date: 2016.09.27 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US9455887B1 patent drawing
  • US9455887B1 patent drawing
  • US9455887B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A distributed performance evaluation framework provides functionality for evaluating the availability, reliability, and scalability of a network-based service. The framework includes a control and reporting tier and a load-generating tier. The control and reporting tier provides a control interface through which a request to evaluate the performance of a service may be received. In response to receiving such a request, the control and reporting tier creates a load-generating job for use by the load-generating tier. Load-generating instances in the load-generating tier are configured to perform the load-generating job by executing instances of a load-generating plug-in configured to generate requests to the service. The load-generating instances also periodically provide data regarding the status of each load-generating job to the control and reporting tier.