Distributed Power-System Project Discovery with Digital Twins

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high costs and complexities associated with assessing and obtaining approval for power-system projects, particularly in distributed systems, make it difficult to amortize overhead and secure funding, especially for projects under $2M, hindering the implementation of renewable energy solutions.

Innovation Solution

A computer system utilizing a pretrained neural network and digital twin to automate the planning, identification, and modification of power-system projects, incorporating data such as wind and solar data, land ownership, and regulatory information, to generate and optimize plans that reduce costs and increase approval chances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional project assessment methods are used for distributed power systems, then project approval can be obtained, but the overhead costs become too high to amortize for smaller projects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject approvalVSAvoidassessment overhead cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and storing regulatory requirements, environmental data, and project parameters in a structured knowledge base before actual project assessment. This allows automated evaluation and plan generation without requiring full manual assessment for each project, thereby reducing overhead costs while maintaining approval reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified copies or representations of complex regulatory and environmental assessment processes through automated algorithms and digital twins. These computational models replicate the essential evaluation functions without requiring full-scale physical or manual assessments, reducing costs while preserving approval quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If centralized power system projects are pursued, then economies of scale can be achieved, but project costs exceed $100M making them inaccessible to many utilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost efficiencyVSAvoidproject cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables segmentation of power systems into distributed smaller projects (e.g., individual wind turbines, solar installations) that can be assessed and approved independently. This allows utilities to pursue multiple smaller projects with lower individual costs rather than requiring single large centralized projects, improving accessibility while maintaining overall productivity through portfolio effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If distributed power system projects are pursued, then project costs are reduced and risks are lowered, but overhead amortization becomes difficult for projects under $2M

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject scaleVSAvoidoverhead amortization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing automated generation of project plans, environmental assessments, and regulatory compliance documentation without requiring extensive external consulting or manual preparation. This reduces the overhead burden on small projects, making them economically viable while maintaining assessment quality and approval chances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250291972A1Discovery of power-system projects
Publication Date: 2025.09.18 BOOTSTRAPLAB LLC
  • US20250291972A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291972A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291972A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system (which may include one or more computers) that identifies a plan for a power-system project is described. During operation, the computer system may access stored information that specifies plans for power-system projects. Then, based at least in part on the information, the computer system may estimate risks and/or ROIs for the power-system projects. Moreover, based at least in part on the estimated risks and/or ROIs, the computer system may identify the plan for the power-system project in the plans for the power-system projects. Next, the computer system may provide second information specifying the identified plan for the power-system project.