Distributed Propulsion Assemblies for VTOL Forward Flight Transition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft designs, such as fixed-wing, tiltrotor, and tiltwing, face challenges in transitioning efficiently between vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) and forward flight modes, particularly in terms of control complexity and downwash inefficiencies, which limit their versatility and operational range.

Innovation Solution

The aircraft features a distributed propulsion system with independently controlled propulsion assemblies and a flight control system that allows for seamless transitions between VTOL and forward flight modes by maintaining a pod assembly in a generally horizontal attitude, enabling vertical takeoff, hovering, and efficient forward flight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If tiltrotor aircraft use fixed wing during vertical takeoff and landing, then forward thrust is provided, but downwash inefficiencies occur due to interference from the fixed wing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforward thrustVSAvoiddownwash inefficiencies
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft separates the functions of vertical lift and forward thrust into distinct propulsion assemblies. During vertical takeoff and landing, only the vertical lift assemblies are active, eliminating the fixed wing from the downwash path and resolving the energy loss issue while maintaining forward thrust capability through the horizontal flight phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The aircraft uses dynamically reconfigurable propulsion assemblies that can change orientation and function. The proprotors can rotate between vertical and horizontal positions, allowing the system to optimize performance for each flight phase: vertical lift during VTOL, and forward thrust during horizontal flight, eliminating the fixed wing interference problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Power

If tiltwing aircraft rotate wing to vertical orientation for VTOL, then vertical thrust efficiency improves, but control complexity increases during hover due to large surface area for crosswinds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertical thrust efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft divides the propulsion system into multiple independent assemblies: vertical lift assemblies for VTOL operations and horizontal flight assemblies for forward flight. This segmentation eliminates the need for a large rotating wing surface during hover, thereby reducing control complexity while maintaining vertical thrust efficiency through the dedicated vertical lift assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The propulsion assemblies dynamically reconfigure their orientation based on flight phase. During hover and VTOL, the vertical lift assemblies operate in a fixed vertical position optimized for lift generation, avoiding the control issues of rotating large wing surfaces. The system transitions to horizontal orientation only when needed for forward flight, simplifying control during each specific phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If aircraft transition between VTOL and forward flight modes, then versatility is improved, but control complexity increases during transitions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight mode versatilityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft segments the propulsion system into independent vertical lift and horizontal flight assemblies, each optimized for specific flight phases. During transitions, the system can selectively activate or deactivate specific assemblies rather than managing complex rotations of entire wing structures, thereby maintaining versatility while reducing control complexity during mode changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The propulsion assemblies perform dynamic reconfiguration during transitions, rotating from vertical to horizontal orientation (or vice versa) as needed. This dynamic capability allows the aircraft to adapt between VTOL and forward flight modes while the flight control system manages the transitions systematically, reducing overall control complexity compared to managing large rotating wing surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances the aircraft's versatility and operational efficiency by simplifying control during transitions and reducing downwash inefficiencies, allowing for safe and efficient transportation of passengers or cargo in various environments.

Implementation Method 1

a propulsion system attached to the airframe... enabling the flying frame to have a vertical takeoff and landing mode and a forward flight mode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrust: Force

Implementation Method 2

a flight control system operably associated with the propulsion system wherein... independently controlled by the flight control system, thereby enabling the flying frame to have a vertical takeoff and landing mode and a forward flight mode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectControl force: Force

Data Source

PatentUS10214285B2Aircraft having autonomous and remote flight control capabilities
Publication Date: 2019.02.26 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US10214285B2 patent drawing
  • US10214285B2 patent drawing
  • US10214285B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, an aircraft includes a flying frame having an airframe with first and second wing members having a plurality of pylons extending therebetween, a distributed propulsion system including a plurality of propulsion assemblies securably attached to the airframe and a flight control system operably associated with the distributed propulsion system. The flying frame has a vertical takeoff and landing mode with the wing members disposed in generally the same horizontal plane and a forward flight mode with the wing members disposed in generally the same vertical plane. The flight control system is operable to command the propulsion assemblies responsive to at least one of remote flight control, autonomous flight control and combinations thereof.