Distributed Rendering with Z-Buffers for Multi-User Display

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current real-time rendering architectures require high resource and bandwidth consumption in rendering hardware for users viewing complex and extensive geometry, especially when multiple users are involved.

Innovation Solution

A distributed rendering and display system that distributes the rendering process across a host device and multiple pipeline rendering devices, utilizing z-buffers to reduce the computational load on each device and allowing simultaneous display of scene data from different perspectives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If rendering hardware performs both culling and rendering for multiple users viewing complex geometry, then viewing capability is improved, but resource and bandwidth consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-user viewing capabilityVSAvoidrendering hardware resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The rendering system is divided into two functional segments: a host device that performs culling and generates z-buffers, and pipeline rendering devices that perform final rendering and display. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in specific tasks, reducing the overall resource burden on any single device while maintaining multi-user viewing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Z-buffers serve as an intermediary data structure between the host device and pipeline rendering devices. Instead of transmitting complete frame buffers or raw geometry data, the system transmits compressed z-buffer depth information, which reduces bandwidth consumption while enabling accurate depth rendering for multiple users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If rendering hardware performs both culling and rendering for multiple users, then viewing capability is improved, but bandwidth consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-user viewing capabilityVSAvoidbandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential depth information from the complete rendering pipeline and transmits it via z-buffers. By separating depth rendering from color rendering, the system transmits minimal data (depth values) rather than complete frame buffers, significantly reducing bandwidth requirements while maintaining multi-user viewing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of transmitting complete color and depth information for each user view, the system creates and transmits shared z-buffer depth maps that can be reused by multiple pipeline rendering devices. This copying of depth information allows efficient multi-user rendering with reduced bandwidth consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Device complexity

If a single device performs all rendering operations, then device complexity is reduced, but rendering performance for complex scenes decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle device architectureVSAvoidrendering performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The rendering workload is segmented between a host device (handling culling and z-buffer generation) and multiple pipeline rendering devices (handling final rendering and display). This segmentation enables parallel processing of rendering operations, significantly improving rendering performance for complex scenes while distributing complexity across multiple specialized devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a dimensional separation between rendering stages: the host device operates in the culling and depth-computation dimension, while pipeline rendering devices operate in the final rendering and display dimension. This dimensional division allows each stage to optimize for its specific function, improving overall rendering performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20260004511A1Distributed rendering and display system
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 HOLOCHIP CORP
  • US20260004511A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004511A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004511A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A distributed rendering and display system comprises a host device for rendering z-buffers from a scene, a set of pipeline rendering devices, and a set of display devices. Each pipeline rendering device is remotely connected to the host device. Each display device is remotely connected to a pipeline rendering device in the set of pipeline rendering devices. Each rendered z-buffer from the scene is associated with a display view perspective of the scene. Each display device in the set of display devices provides display view perspectives of the scene to one or more users.