Distributed Robotic Control Modules for Vehicle Space Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous vehicle systems face challenges with bulky centralized control systems that occupy valuable space, require significant redesign for each new resource addition, and lack a vehicle-wide network, compromising passenger and payload areas and neglecting survivability and depot-level maintenance needs.

Innovation Solution

A robotic control module with integrated processor, actuator controller, packet network switch, and power supply in a compact, mountable package that allows for interchangeable functionality and distributed processing, reducing heat and electromagnetic noise, and enabling easy maintenance and adaptation across different vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a centralized robotic control system is used, then control functionality is achieved, but vehicle space is significantly reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous control functionalityVSAvoidvehicle space
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized control system into multiple distributed robotic control units (RCUs), each capable of independent operation. Each RCU contains a processor, memory, and control circuits that can autonomously manage specific vehicle functions, eliminating the need for a single large centralized computer and thereby preserving vehicle space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-point (centralized) control architecture to a multi-point (distributed) architecture across the vehicle network. By distributing control functions across multiple spatial locations rather than consolidating them in one central location, the system maintains autonomous functionality while reducing the volume occupied by control hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If separate control packages are used for each function, then functional independence is achieved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional independenceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs each RCU as a universal control unit capable of performing multiple functions through software configuration rather than requiring separate hardware for each function. The standardized interface and modular architecture allow the same physical unit to handle different control tasks, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining functional independence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic functionality where RCUs can be reconfigured and reassigned based on operational needs. The system allows flexible allocation of control functions to different RCUs, enabling adaptability without requiring permanent dedicated hardware for each function, thus managing complexity through software-based dynamics rather than fixed hardware architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If hardened control packages are used, then reliability is improved, but payload and cargo space are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system reliabilityVSAvoidpayload and cargo space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control system into small, distributed RCUs that can be strategically placed in available spaces throughout the vehicle rather than requiring large dedicated hardened enclosures. This segmentation allows the control functionality to be distributed in smaller units that occupy minimal space, preserving payload and cargo areas while maintaining reliability through redundancy and distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by placing RCUs close to the systems they control, reducing communication delays and improving response time. This localized distribution allows each RCU to be small and efficiently positioned in available spaces rather than requiring large centralized hardened packages, thereby maintaining reliability while minimizing space consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If a vehicle-wide network is implemented, then communication capability is enhanced, but heat generation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication capabilityVSAvoidheat generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the communication network into multiple local wireless connections between RCUs and vehicle systems rather than implementing a single large centralized communication hub. This distributed wireless mesh network provides vehicle-wide communication capability while distributing heat generation across many small low-power nodes rather than concentrating it in one location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional wired mechanical communication systems with wireless communication technology. This substitution eliminates the need for extensive physical wiring harnesses and associated heat-generating connectors and signal amplifiers, providing enhanced communication capability while reducing overall heat generation through the use of low-power wireless protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9429944B2Versatile robotic control module
Publication Date: 2016.08.30 IROBOT CORP
  • US9429944B2 patent drawing
  • US9429944B2 patent drawing
  • US9429944B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain embodiments of the present invention provide robotic control modules for use in a robotic control system of a vehicle, including structures, systems and methods, that can provide (i) a robotic control module that has multiple functional circuits, such as a processor and accompanying circuits, an actuator controller, an actuator amplifier, a packet network switch, and a power supply integrated into a mountable and/or stackable package/housing; (ii) a robotic control module with the noted complement of circuits that is configured to reduce heat, reduce space, shield sensitive components from electro-magnetic noise; (iii) a robotic control system utilizing robotic control modules that include the sufficiently interchangeable functionality allowing for interchangeability of modules; and (iv) a robotic control system that distributes the functionality and processing among a plurality of robotic control modules in a vehicle.