Distributed Route Facility Coordination for Automated Track Systems
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing track systems require a higher-level control center for automated operation, which increases costs and complexity, especially in non-complex systems where such a center would be burdensome.
Innovation Solution
Implementing a method where route facilities communicate and coordinate with each other to determine if a vehicle can reach its desired destination, allowing or prohibiting entry into the first route section based on the consensus, without the need for a higher-level control facility, using integrated switches or route signals to manage route sections and send travel permission requests.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Extent of automation
If a higher-level control center is used to manage track sections, then automated operation and route coordination are achieved, but system costs and complexity increase disproportionately
Solution Approach 1:
The control function is segmented and distributed to individual route facilities (switches and route signals) rather than centralized in a single control center. Each route facility independently manages its own route section and communicates with adjacent facilities, enabling automated operation while reducing overall system complexity.
Solution Approach 2:
Route facilities perform self-coordination through direct communication with each other. When a vehicle requests route entry, the first route facility coordinates with downstream facilities autonomously to determine route availability, eliminating the need for external control center intervention and reducing system complexity.
2Extent of automation
If a higher-level control center is used to manage track sections, then automated operation and route coordination are achieved, but overall system costs increase
Solution Approach 1:
The control functionality is divided into distributed route facilities that already exist in the track system (switches and route signals). This eliminates the need to build and maintain an expensive centralized control center, achieving automated operation at lower cost.
Solution Approach 2:
Existing route facilities (switches and route signals) are given additional control and coordination functions. Rather than adding a separate control center, these universal facilities handle both traditional route management and automated coordination, reducing overall system cost.
3Productivity
If vehicles enter route sections without prior coordination, then route capacity is increased, but safety and route section availability are compromised
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary coordination checks before allowing vehicle entry into route sections. The first route facility queries downstream facilities in advance to confirm route availability, ensuring safety and reliability while still enabling efficient route capacity utilization through automated rapid coordination.
Solution Approach 2:
Downstream route facilities provide feedback to the first route facility regarding their availability status. This feedback mechanism enables the system to make informed decisions about vehicle entry, maintaining route section availability and safety while optimizing route capacity.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
The invention relates to a method for operating a track system (20) which comprises two or more path sections (SA1-SA5). In accordance with the invention it is provided that the path sections (SA1-SA5) are each managed by an associated path device (SE1-SE5) which allows or prohibits travel over the corresponding path section (SA1-SA5), a vehicle (10) which wishes to reach a destination (FZ) on the track system (20) sends a travel permission request (FA) specifying at least the destination (FZ), and one of the path devices (SE1-SE5), after consultation with all other path devices (SE1-SE5) whose associated path sections (SA1-SA5) would also be travelled over in order to reach the destination (FZ) - referred to hereinafter as relevant path devices (SE1-SE5) -, sends a response (AT) back to the vehicle (10), by means of which response the travel over the path sections (SA1-SA5) and the entry into the first path section (SA1-SA5) is allowed or entry into the first path section (SA1-SA5) is prohibited.