Distributed Data Storage With Variable Redundancy and Synchronized Offsets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for storing and rebuilding video surveillance data, such as RAID and backup schemes, face inefficiencies in disk space usage and redundancy, particularly when handling data loss or corruption, and lack flexibility in adjusting redundancy levels based on data importance.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that splits data into N pieces and generates M redundancy pieces, storing them on separate storage media with synchronized offsets, allowing for flexible redundancy adjustment and efficient use of disk space, using erasure coding algorithms like Reed Solomon to rebuild lost data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If full duplicates of the data are stored (RAID1), then data reliability is improved, but disk capacity requirement doubles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata reliabilityVSAvoiddisk capacity requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides data into multiple blocks and distributes them across different storage media, rather than creating full duplicates. This segmentation allows for more efficient use of storage space while maintaining reliability through distributed redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the redundancy parameter from fixed (RAID1 requires 100% duplicate, RAID5/6 have fixed parity) to variable, allowing the system to adjust the number of redundant blocks based on data importance and available storage capacity, thus optimizing the balance between reliability and storage efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If RAID 5 and 6 are used, then storage overhead is reduced, but flexibility in redundancy adjustment is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage overheadVSAvoidredundancy adjustment flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic redundancy system where the number of redundant blocks can be adjusted based on data importance and storage availability. Unlike static RAID configurations, this system can adaptively change redundancy levels without requiring complete system reconfiguration or rebuilds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows dynamic modification of redundancy parameters, enabling users to increase or decrease the number of redundant blocks based on changing requirements. This parameter flexibility resolves the contradiction between low storage overhead and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If erasure coding is used, then arbitrary combinations of data and redundant blocks are possible, but rebuilding complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveredundancy configuration flexibilityVSAvoidrebuilding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments data into manageable blocks with associated metadata that tracks their relationships. This segmentation simplifies the rebuilding process by allowing the system to identify and reconstruct only the specific missing blocks needed, rather than complex global recalculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary organization of data blocks and metadata during the initial storage phase, establishing clear relationships between data and redundant blocks. This preliminary structuring simplifies subsequent rebuilding operations by providing a ready framework for reconstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If fixed size disk sets are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but ability to handle drive failures gracefully is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidfailure handling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic disk set configuration that can adapt when drives are added or removed. The system can recalculate and redistribute data and redundancy blocks across the available drives, maintaining reliability without requiring fixed-size configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system design allows storage media to serve multiple functions - data blocks, redundant blocks, or both - depending on configuration needs. This universality enables flexible handling of drive failures while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11409603B2Method of storing items of data
Publication Date: 2022.08.09 VAION LTD
  • US11409603B2 patent drawing
  • US11409603B2 patent drawing
  • US11409603B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method of storing an item of data across a plurality of storage media, the method comprising the steps of: receiving an item of data to be stored; splitting the item of data into N pieces of data; generating M redundancy pieces of data, usable to rebuild the item of data; storing each of the N pieces of data and M redundancy pieces of data on separate storage media of the plurality of storage media at a same offset within a file of the respective storage medium, the files of the storage media containing the N pieces of data and the M redundancy pieces of data being associated as a file set; and storing, separately to the N pieces of data and M redundancy pieces of data, the offset and the file set.