Distributed Target Localization With Probability Maps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surveillance systems fail to address issues of universality, redundant distributed processing, likelihood of accuracy, maintenance, and optimality in calculating the real-time simultaneous locations of multiple targets, particularly in contexts involving both friend and foe targets, and are prone to single-point failures and data corruption.

Innovation Solution

A surveillance system with redundant distributed computing capabilities, moving sensor functionality, uncertainty quantification, and analytical optimization methods to calculate target positions using a network of moving detection units, employing error-bounding techniques and probability maps to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single centralized processing subsystem is used to calculate target positions, then the system structure is simple, but the system is prone to single-point failures and data corruption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized processing subsystem into multiple distributed processing units, each capable of independently calculating target positions. This segmentation eliminates the single-point failure risk while maintaining computational functionality through distributed architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each processing unit in the distributed system performs specialized local calculations for target position determination using sensor data from its vicinity. This local processing capability improves reliability while the overall system structure remains manageable through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If fixed sensor positions are used for multilateration, then the system implementation is straightforward, but the system lacks adaptability to different operational contexts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem implementationVSAvoidcontext adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables sensors to transition from fixed positions to mobile platforms, allowing the sensor array to dynamically reposition itself based on operational requirements. This dynamic capability provides context adaptability while maintaining implementation feasibility through standardized sensor modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The distributed sensor array is designed to function across multiple operational contexts (friend/foe target identification, aerial/ground surveillance, various environmental conditions) through universal sensor modules that can be deployed in diverse configurations without requiring context-specific customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If position calculations are performed without uncertainty quantification, then the calculation process is simpler, but the accuracy and reliability of position reports cannot be guaranteed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation processVSAvoidposition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates uncertainty quantification that provides feedback on the reliability of each position calculation. This feedback mechanism uses statistical analysis of multilateration results to generate confidence intervals, enabling the system to assess and report position accuracy without fundamentally changing the core calculation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary statistical analysis and error bounding calculations before final position reporting. This preliminary action establishes confidence intervals and accuracy metrics in advance, ensuring measurement precision is guaranteed before results are presented to users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If sensor data is processed without corruption detection, then the processing speed is faster, but the system cannot detect or prevent data corruption from affecting position calculations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiddata integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements rapid corruption detection that skips detailed analysis of obviously valid data while quickly identifying and flagging corrupted signals. This approach maintains high processing speed for legitimate data while efficiently detecting corruption through statistical anomaly detection and consistency checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by implementing corruption detection algorithms that identify and isolate corrupted data before it can affect position calculations. This preventive measure uses consistency checks and statistical validation to block corrupted data streams, ensuring data integrity without significantly impacting processing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides real-time, accurate, and reliable position reports for multiple targets by quantifying accuracy, detecting data corruption, and preventing single-point failures, ensuring consistent performance across various contexts and environments.

Implementation Method 1

the arrival time of each target is based on an absolute timing schedule

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Implementation Method 2

each theater detection unit has a central processing unit configured to (a) transmit and receive electromagnetic energy to/from each target

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic energy transmission: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20250383440A1Surveillance system for the optimal calculation of the real-time simultaneous locations of multiple targets
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 HALL TIMOTHY GRANT
  • US20250383440A1 patent drawing
  • US20250383440A1 patent drawing
  • US20250383440A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A surveillance system for the optimal calculation of the real-time simultaneous locations of multiple targets. The surveillance system uses the known locations in a given 2- or 3-dimensional frame of reference of possibly moving in a known path or statically located detection units for the simultaneous calculation in real-time of the locations of multiple targets that are either transmitting a coded identification signal at regular time intervals or are detected through the return of energy of unidentified targets. The calculated position for each target includes a point in the frame of reference most likely to be the actual position of the target based on the expected variability of the coded identification signals, along with a probability map, such as a 2-dimensional ellipse or 3-dimensional ellipsoid, separately for each target, presenting the likelihood of the actual position of the target being within a particular region of the frame of reference.