Risk Analysis of Distributed Test Objects via Context Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current risk analysis methods for distributed test objects fail to consider these objects in different contexts, leading to either holistic analyses that ignore context-specific assumptions or multiple analyses that make reciprocal assumptions, resulting in incomplete or inconsistent risk assessments.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for semi-automated or fully automated risk analysis of distributed test objects, which involves conducting risk analyses in distinct contexts and exchanging information about protection requirements to automate the consideration of reciprocal dependencies and mitigate risks across contexts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a holistic risk analysis is performed for distributed test objects, then the analysis covers all contexts, but context-specific assumptions are ignored leading to incomplete risk assessment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of risk assessmentVSAvoidcontext-specific assumptions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the distributed test object into multiple context-specific parts, each analyzed in its own analysis context. This allows context-specific assumptions to be preserved in each segment while the overall system remains comprehensively covered. The segmentation enables separate risk analyses for each context (e.g., embedded system, IT system, mobile device) without losing context-specific information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism (information exchange about protection requirements and transmission paths) that connects the separate context-specific analyses. This intermediary allows context-specific assumptions to be communicated between analyses, resolving the contradiction by enabling both holistic coverage and context-specific precision through a mediating information exchange process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple separate risk analyses are performed for different contexts, then context-specific assumptions are considered, but reciprocal assumptions lead to inconsistent risk assessments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontext-specific accuracyVSAvoidconsistency of risk assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback loops where protection requirements identified in one context are exchanged and considered in other contexts. The analysis results from different contexts feed back into each other, allowing reciprocal assumptions to be consistently resolved. This feedback mechanism ensures that context-specific analyses remain consistent with each other while maintaining their individual accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal framework that can handle multiple context-specific analyses simultaneously. The system is designed to process different analysis contexts (embedded systems, IT systems, mobile devices) with their own specific assumptions, while providing a unified output that ensures consistency across all contexts through standardized information exchange about protection requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual processes are used to exchange protection requirements between contexts, then flexibility is maintained, but complexity and susceptibility to error increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in analysisVSAvoidcomplexity of analysis process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the risk analysis system to automatically exchange protection requirement information between different context-specific analyses without manual intervention. The system self-services by automatically identifying transmission paths, exchanging protection requirements, and integrating results across contexts. This automation reduces complexity and error susceptibility while maintaining the flexibility to handle diverse analysis contexts through standardized automatic processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250200191A1Risk analysis of a distributed test object
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 VOLKSWAGEN AG
  • US20250200191A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200191A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200191A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, a computer program with instructions, and a system for the risk analysis of a distributed test object. The disclosed embodiment also relates to devices for use in such a system. According to the invention, a risk analysis for a part of the test object located in a first context is carried out. In addition, a risk analysis for a part of the test object located in a second context is carried out. If a protection requirement is determined in the case of one of the risk analyses, information relating to this determined protection requirement is exchanged between the risk analyses. The determined protection requirement can then be taken into account in that a risk-enhancing measure is determined. In this case, information relating to the determined risk-enhancing measure can be exchanged between the risk analyses.