Distributed Unit Air-Interface Control for Low-Latency Interference Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communications networks face challenges in efficiently managing inter-cell interference, cell mobility, and latency due to the centralized control architecture, particularly in dense deployments where high latency and increased message exchanges between central and distributed units are common.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an air interface between distributed units (DUs) to enable direct exchange of control information, including radio resource management and radio resource control functions, allowing DUs to perform control functions independently or in conjunction with the central unit, reducing the need for multiple message exchanges and latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If centralized control architecture is used, then control functions are managed from central unit, but latency increases and message exchanges between central and distributed units become frequent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol function managementVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control functions are segmented between central unit and distributed units. The distributed unit performs radio resource management functions locally while the central unit handles higher-level control, reducing the need for frequent message exchanges and minimizing latency in time-sensitive operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The distributed unit acts as an intermediary between the central unit and the radio interface. It receives control information from the central unit, processes it locally, and executes control functions directly at the radio interface, reducing the communication overhead and latency associated with direct centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If centralized control architecture is used, then control functions are managed from central unit, but number of message exchanges between central and distributed units increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol function managementVSAvoidmessage exchange efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Control functions are segmented such that time-sensitive radio resource management operations are performed locally at the distributed unit, while strategic control decisions are made at the central unit. This segmentation reduces the frequency of message exchanges for routine operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The distributed unit performs preliminary processing of control information locally before executing control functions. It pre-processes radio resource allocation and management tasks, reducing the need for subsequent message exchanges with the central unit for routine operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of time

If distributed control is implemented, then latency is reduced, but interference management between cells becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidinterference management
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The distributed unit continuously monitors radio conditions and interference levels in its coverage area, providing feedback to both local control decisions and the central unit. This feedback mechanism enables adaptive interference management that responds to real-time conditions while maintaining overall network coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Interference management strategies are tailored to local conditions at each distributed unit based on measured radio environment characteristics. Each unit adjusts its control parameters according to local interference levels, while the central unit coordinates broader interference management policies across multiple cells.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250220506A1Methods and distributed units
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US20250220506A1 patent drawing
  • US20250220506A1 patent drawing
  • US20250220506A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling a distributed unit, DU, connected to a central unit, CU, of a wireless communications network is provided. The method comprises receiving, from another DU connected to the CU, information for controlling communications with a communications device controlled by the DU. The information for controlling communications with the communications device being received over an air interface connecting the DU and the other DU. The method comprises controlling communications with the communications device based on the information for controlling communications with the communications device received over the air interface. The controlling the communications with the communications device comprises executing one or more control functions including at least a radio resource management, RRM, function.