Distributed Video Encoding I-Frame Placement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current distributed video encoding systems struggle with accurately placing I-frames and allocating bits per frame, leading to suboptimal video quality and encoding efficiency, especially when dealing with user devices that are often offline and rely on service providers for content availability.

Innovation Solution

A distributed video encoding system that uses a complexity analyzer to allocate bits per frame based on segment complexity, splits videos into overlapping segments for precise I-frame placement, and employs multiple encoders to optimize encoding parameters, ensuring accurate key frame placement and uniform quality across segments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If distributed video encoding is used to handle offline user devices, then content availability is improved, but I-frame placement accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent availabilityVSAvoidI-frame placement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The video is divided into multiple segments that are distributed across different encoding nodes. Each segment is independently encoded with I-frames placed at segment boundaries, ensuring both distributed processing capability and accurate key frame placement for reliable content availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A coordination mechanism acts as an intermediary between distributed encoding nodes and the final video output. This mediator manages I-frame placement across segments, ensuring accurate key frame positioning while maintaining the benefits of distributed encoding for offline device compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If multiple encoders are used for distributed encoding, then encoding efficiency is improved, but bit allocation precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveencoding efficiencyVSAvoidbit allocation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Each encoder in the distributed system applies local bit allocation strategies optimized for its specific video segment. The complexity analyzer provides segment-specific complexity metrics that guide bit allocation at each encoding node, maintaining precision despite distributed processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Bit allocation parameters are dynamically adjusted based on segment complexity analysis. Each encoder receives tailored allocation parameters for its segment, allowing precise bit distribution across multiple encoders while maintaining overall video quality consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If videos are split into overlapping segments, then I-frame placement accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveI-frame placement accuracyVSAvoidsegment management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The video is segmented with intentional overlaps at I-frame boundaries. This segmentation strategy ensures accurate I-frame placement while the overlap provides natural transition points that simplify the coordination logic needed in distributed encoding nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Segment boundaries and I-frame placement points are predetermined before distributed encoding begins. This preliminary planning reduces the complexity of real-time coordination by establishing fixed reference points that each encoder can independently follow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If complexity analyzer is used for bit allocation, then video quality uniformity is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo quality uniformityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The complexity analysis is performed separately on each video segment rather than the entire video. This segmentation of the analysis process reduces the computational burden and processing time while still achieving uniform quality across the complete video through consistent segment-level optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10341561B2Distributed image stabilization
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 META PLATFORMS INC
  • US10341561B2 patent drawing
  • US10341561B2 patent drawing
  • US10341561B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a distributed video encoding system, a video is encoded by splitting into video segments and encoding the segments using multiple encoders. Prior to segmenting the video for distributed video encoding, image stabilization is performed on the video. For each frame in the video, a corresponding transform operation is first computed based on an estimated camera movement. Next, the video is segmented into multiple video segments and the corresponding per-frame transform information for the multiple video segments. The video segments are then distributed to multiple processing nodes that perform the image stabilization of the corresponding video segment by applying the corresponding transform. The results from all the stabilized video segments are then stitched back together for further video encoding operation.