Distributed Electronic Wallet Security via Multi-Lock Encryption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing IoT devices face challenges in securely and reliably implementing electronic wallets, particularly due to constraints on memory and processing power, which can lead to security issues such as balance loss to hackers.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a crypto multi-lock process using multiple encryption techniques and multi-signature methods, combined with enhanced privacy ID (EPID) for distributed wallet keys and fractional transactions, enhances the security and reliability of electronic wallets on constrained IoT devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If crypto-currency is implemented in IoT devices with constraints on memory and processing power, then transaction capability is enabled, but security issues arise leading to balance loss to hackers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction capabilityVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The private key is divided into multiple shares using secret sharing schemes, distributing cryptographic security across multiple IoT devices rather than concentrating it in a single device. This segmentation enables transaction capability while enhancing security through distributed key management, preventing single-point compromise that led to balance loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements nested encryption layers where multiple encryption techniques are applied hierarchically to protect the private key shares. Each layer provides additional security protection, creating a nested structure that must be systematically decrypted, thereby maintaining security reliability while enabling secure transactions in constrained IoT environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If multiple encryption techniques and multi-signature methods are implemented, then security is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidencryption complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex security protocol is segmented into distinct functional modules: key generation, key sharing, encryption layers, and multi-signature verification. Each module operates independently with well-defined interfaces, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining enhanced security through coordinated operation of these segmented components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary components such as key management servers and coordination protocols that mediate between the complex encryption techniques and the constrained IoT devices. These intermediaries handle computationally intensive operations centrally, allowing individual devices to participate in secure transactions without bearing the full complexity burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If distributed wallet keys are used, then security against balance loss is improved, but memory and processing constraints are exacerbated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against balance lossVSAvoidmemory resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the computationally intensive and memory-intensive key management operations from the constrained IoT devices and relocates them to external key management infrastructure. Only essential cryptographic primitives remain on-device, while distributed key shares and encryption/decryption operations are performed externally, reducing memory requirements while maintaining protection against balance loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces physical storage of complete private keys in device memory with cryptographic mathematical operations on distributed key shares. Instead of storing large key materials locally, the system uses mathematical relationships among share fragments that require minimal storage but provide equivalent security, effectively substituting mechanical storage with computational cryptography.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12282956B2Securing distributed electronic wallet shares
Publication Date: 2025.04.22 INTEL CORP
  • US12282956B2 patent drawing
  • US12282956B2 patent drawing
  • US12282956B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for securing distributed shares of an electronic wallet. An example method includes provisioning a plurality of devices each hosting an e-wallet share with enhanced privacy identification (EPID) private keys for the e-wallet share. A signature is posted for the e-wallet share to a blockchain. A determination is made as to whether the e-wallet share is compromised, and, if so, posting a revocation list comprising the signature for the e-wallet share to a blockchain.