Diverse Activation Neural Networks for Higher Model Expressiveness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing artificial neural networks lack diversity in activation functions within each layer, limiting their expressiveness and accuracy in classification and regression tasks.

Innovation Solution

Implementing learned diversity neural networks (LDNNs) with varying activation functions within each layer, trained using meta-learning to optimize inner and outer network parameters, allowing sub-networks to evolve diverse activation functions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If identical neurons are used in each network layer, then the network structure is simple and easy to implement, but the network expressiveness and accuracy are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork structureVSAvoidnetwork expressiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing diversity in activation functions at different locations (layers) of the neural network. Each layer can have different activation functions selected from a set of candidate functions, allowing each layer to be optimized for its specific computational role rather than using a uniform activation function throughout the entire network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making the activation functions learnable and adaptable during training. The network dynamically selects and adjusts activation functions from a set of candidates based on the training data and task requirements, allowing the network structure to evolve and optimize its expressiveness over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If identical neurons are used in each network layer, then the training process is simple, but the network accuracy in classification and regression tasks is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining processVSAvoidnetwork accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by varying the activation function parameters across different layers and positions in the network. Instead of using a fixed identical activation function everywhere, the system changes the activation function parameters to optimize performance for different computational tasks and data characteristics, thereby improving accuracy while maintaining manageable training complexity through systematic parameter variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If diverse activation functions are introduced within each layer, then network expressiveness and accuracy are enhanced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork expressivenessVSAvoidnetwork structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the neural network into layers, where each layer can independently select from a set of candidate activation functions. This modular approach allows diversity to be introduced in a controlled manner at different segments of the network, managing complexity through systematic layer-by-layer configuration rather than attempting uniform diversity throughout the entire network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universality by providing a universal set of candidate activation functions that can be applied across different layers and positions in the network. This multi-functional approach allows the same set of candidate functions to serve multiple purposes across different computational tasks, reducing the need for completely different activation functions for each layer and thereby managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250342352A1Diversity based deep learning system
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV
  • US20250342352A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342352A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342352A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various examples are provided related to diversity based deep learning. In one example, a learned diversity neural network (LDNN) system includes an input layer; an output layer; and at least one hidden layer including at least one activation function neuronal network. The at least one activation function neuronal network includes an input node, an output node, and a plurality of intermediate nodes coupled between the input and output nodes and isolated from other nodes or other activation function neuronal networks of the at least one hidden layer.